Skip to main content

Lucky 7: The Insider-Trading Schemes That Paid the Most

As everybody knows, insider trading is the easiest way to make big bucks in the stock market. Here are some of the celebrated cases of alleged insider trading worldwide:-

1) Mathew Martoma: The hedge fund manager is charged with trading on inside information from a doctor who was working on a joint-drug trial with Elan Corp. and Wyeth on the development of an Alzheimer’s drug. Based on the information, Mr. Martoma led his firm CR Intrinsic and an affiliated investment adviser to liquidate their positions in both companies and to take short positions, according to prosecutors and SEC attorneys.

All told, the hedge funds allegedly made profits and avoided losses of more than $276 million, according to U.S. officials. Mr. Martoma’s attorneys said in a statement, “Mathew Martoma was an exceptional portfolio manager who succeeded through hard work and the dogged pursuit of information in the public domain.”

2) Raj Rajaratnam: His remarkable journey from Sri Lanka to the heights of the hedge-fund world to convicted felon ended in October 2011 when he was sentenced to 11 years in prison, then the longest-ever term imposed in an insider-trading case. Prosecutors said Mr. Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, reaped $72 million in illegal profits and losses avoided from his insider trading. Mr. Rajaratnam’s lawyers argued that only about $7.46 million in alleged gains shouldhave been attributed to him personally.

3) Todd Newman: A former portfolio manager with Diamondback Capital Management LLC, who is currently on trial with Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors LP, for allegedly sharing and trading on confidential information about technology stocks. About $70 million in profits was made in the alleged scheme, according to prosecutors. Messrs. Newman and Chiasson have pleaded not guilty to conspiracy and securities fraud charges.

4) Ivan F. Boesky: The inspiration for Wall Street’s Gordon Gekko, Mr. Boesky was sentenced to three years in prison in 1987 for conspiring to file false stock trading records. A year earlier, he had settled civil insider-trading charges with the SEC, paying a record $100 million. The SEC said he earned more than $50 million by trading inside information he bought from an investment banker.

5) Matthew Kluger: A former corporate lawyer who profited from his inside knowledge of corporate deals handled by the law firms he worked for over a 17-year period. Mr. Kluger was sentenced in June to 12 years in prison, the current record sentence in an insider-trading case. Garrett Bauer, a 44-year-old former trader who received Mr. Kluger’s tips through a middleman, pleaded guilty in the scheme and was sentenced to nine years in prison. The scheme netted the participants $32 million in profits, the bulk to Mr. Bauer, prosecutors said.

6) Joseph “Chip” Skowron III: He was sentenced to five years in prison in November 2011 after admitting to using secret tips from a French doctor working on clinical-drug trials to avoid millions of dollars in trading losses. (Sound familiar?) A former manager at hedge fund FrontPoint Partners, Mr. Skowron directed several FrontPoint health-care funds to dump millions of dollars of shares in biotechnology company Human Genome Sciences Inc. in 2008 based on the inside information. 

He avoided about $30 million in trading losses, prosecutors said.

7) Zvi Goffer: A former employee at Galleon whom prosecutors called the “ringleader” of an insider-trading scheme involving traders and lawyers, Mr. Goffer was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2011 after being found guilty of 14 counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. His brother Emanuel Goffer and Michael Kimelman, who were both traders, were each convicted of conspiracy and two counts of securities fraud. In a related civil complaint, the SEC said one part of the scheme, based on tips from corporate lawyers, netted more than $20 million in illegal profits

Remember that these are the once which have come out into public domain. There are hundreds which never get caught.

http://profit.ndtv.com/news/banking-finance/article-state-run-foreign-banks-hit-by-bad-loans-rbi-313160

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC explained

Cause Title :  Ganesh Prasad vs Rajeshwar Prasad, SLP (C) NO. 28377 OF 2018, Supreme Court Of India Date of Judgment/Order : 14/3/2023 Corum : J. B. Pardiwala, J. Citied:  Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswamy & Sons and Others reported in (2009) 10 SCC 84 North Eastern Railway Administration, Gorakhpur v. Bhagwan Das reported in (2008) 8 SCC 511 P.A. Jayalakshmi v. H. Saradha and Others reported in (2009) 14 SCC 525 B.K. Narayana Pillai v. Parameswaran Pillai and Another reported in (2000) 1 SCC 712 A.K. Gupta and Sons Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation reported in AIR 1967 SC 96 Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Sanjeev Builders Private Limited and Another, Civil Appeal No. 5909 of 2022 dated 01.09.2022 Firm Sriniwas Ram Kumar v. Mahabir Prasad and Others reported in AIR 1951 SC 177 G. Nagamma and Another v. Siromanamma and Another reported in (1996) 2 SCC 25 Praful Manohar Rele v. Krishnabai Narayan Ghosalkar and Others reported in (2014...
Post a Comment
Read more

Owner of vehicle is not expected to verify the genuineness of the driving license before appointing a driver

Cause Title : Rishi Pal Singh Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 4919 Of 2022, The Supreme Court Of India Date of Judgment/Order : July 26, 2022 Corum : Hemant Gupta; J., Vikram Nath; J. Background the truck owned by the appellant met with an accident. The owner deposed before the court that before employing the driver, he had taken his driving test and that he was driving the vehicle satisfactorily and  that the driver was employed with him for 3 years before the date of the accident. He produced his driving license. This was reaffirmed by the driver who deposed that the driving license was obtained from the driver and it was issued from Nagaland, but no such license was produced on record. Both the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the High Court have held that the owner has alleged that the driver had a driving license from Nagaland but the same was not produced and therefore, the Insurance Company is entitled to recover the awarded amount...
Post a Comment
Read more

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more