Skip to main content

Lucky 7: The Insider-Trading Schemes That Paid the Most

As everybody knows, insider trading is the easiest way to make big bucks in the stock market. Here are some of the celebrated cases of alleged insider trading worldwide:-

1) Mathew Martoma: The hedge fund manager is charged with trading on inside information from a doctor who was working on a joint-drug trial with Elan Corp. and Wyeth on the development of an Alzheimer’s drug. Based on the information, Mr. Martoma led his firm CR Intrinsic and an affiliated investment adviser to liquidate their positions in both companies and to take short positions, according to prosecutors and SEC attorneys.

All told, the hedge funds allegedly made profits and avoided losses of more than $276 million, according to U.S. officials. Mr. Martoma’s attorneys said in a statement, “Mathew Martoma was an exceptional portfolio manager who succeeded through hard work and the dogged pursuit of information in the public domain.”

2) Raj Rajaratnam: His remarkable journey from Sri Lanka to the heights of the hedge-fund world to convicted felon ended in October 2011 when he was sentenced to 11 years in prison, then the longest-ever term imposed in an insider-trading case. Prosecutors said Mr. Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, reaped $72 million in illegal profits and losses avoided from his insider trading. Mr. Rajaratnam’s lawyers argued that only about $7.46 million in alleged gains shouldhave been attributed to him personally.

3) Todd Newman: A former portfolio manager with Diamondback Capital Management LLC, who is currently on trial with Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors LP, for allegedly sharing and trading on confidential information about technology stocks. About $70 million in profits was made in the alleged scheme, according to prosecutors. Messrs. Newman and Chiasson have pleaded not guilty to conspiracy and securities fraud charges.

4) Ivan F. Boesky: The inspiration for Wall Street’s Gordon Gekko, Mr. Boesky was sentenced to three years in prison in 1987 for conspiring to file false stock trading records. A year earlier, he had settled civil insider-trading charges with the SEC, paying a record $100 million. The SEC said he earned more than $50 million by trading inside information he bought from an investment banker.

5) Matthew Kluger: A former corporate lawyer who profited from his inside knowledge of corporate deals handled by the law firms he worked for over a 17-year period. Mr. Kluger was sentenced in June to 12 years in prison, the current record sentence in an insider-trading case. Garrett Bauer, a 44-year-old former trader who received Mr. Kluger’s tips through a middleman, pleaded guilty in the scheme and was sentenced to nine years in prison. The scheme netted the participants $32 million in profits, the bulk to Mr. Bauer, prosecutors said.

6) Joseph “Chip” Skowron III: He was sentenced to five years in prison in November 2011 after admitting to using secret tips from a French doctor working on clinical-drug trials to avoid millions of dollars in trading losses. (Sound familiar?) A former manager at hedge fund FrontPoint Partners, Mr. Skowron directed several FrontPoint health-care funds to dump millions of dollars of shares in biotechnology company Human Genome Sciences Inc. in 2008 based on the inside information. 

He avoided about $30 million in trading losses, prosecutors said.

7) Zvi Goffer: A former employee at Galleon whom prosecutors called the “ringleader” of an insider-trading scheme involving traders and lawyers, Mr. Goffer was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2011 after being found guilty of 14 counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. His brother Emanuel Goffer and Michael Kimelman, who were both traders, were each convicted of conspiracy and two counts of securities fraud. In a related civil complaint, the SEC said one part of the scheme, based on tips from corporate lawyers, netted more than $20 million in illegal profits

Remember that these are the once which have come out into public domain. There are hundreds which never get caught.

http://profit.ndtv.com/news/banking-finance/article-state-run-foreign-banks-hit-by-bad-loans-rbi-313160

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

One Sided Clauses In Builder-Buyer Agreements Is An Unfair Trade Practice

In CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12238 OF 2018, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. vs Govindan Raghavan, an appeal was filed before the Supreme Court  by the builder against the order of the National Consumer Forum. The builder had relied upon various clauses of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement to refute the claim of the respondent but was rejected by the commission which found the said clauses as wholly one-sided, unfair and unreasonable, and could not be relied upon. The Supreme Court on perusal of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement found stark incongruities between the remedies available to both the parties. For example, Clause 6.4 (ii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to charge Interest @18% p.a. on account of any delay in payment of installments from the Respondent – Flat Purchaser. Clause 6.4 (iii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to cancel the allotment and terminate the Agreement, if any installment remains in arrears for more than 30 da...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inherited property of childless hindu woman devolve onto heirs of her parents

In Tarabai Dagdu Nitanware vs Narayan Keru Nitanware, quashing an order passed by a joint civil judge junior division, Pune, the Bombay High Court has held that under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother, will devolve upon the heirs of her father/mother, if she dies without any children of her own, and not upon her husband. Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing a writ petition filed by relatives of one Sundarabai, who died issueless more than 45 years ago on June 18, 1962. Article referred:http://www.livelaw.in/property-inherited-female-hindu-parents-shall-devolve-upon-heirs-father-not-husband-dies-childless-bombay-hc-read-judgment/
Post a Comment
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more