Skip to main content

Lucky 7: The Insider-Trading Schemes That Paid the Most

As everybody knows, insider trading is the easiest way to make big bucks in the stock market. Here are some of the celebrated cases of alleged insider trading worldwide:-

1) Mathew Martoma: The hedge fund manager is charged with trading on inside information from a doctor who was working on a joint-drug trial with Elan Corp. and Wyeth on the development of an Alzheimer’s drug. Based on the information, Mr. Martoma led his firm CR Intrinsic and an affiliated investment adviser to liquidate their positions in both companies and to take short positions, according to prosecutors and SEC attorneys.

All told, the hedge funds allegedly made profits and avoided losses of more than $276 million, according to U.S. officials. Mr. Martoma’s attorneys said in a statement, “Mathew Martoma was an exceptional portfolio manager who succeeded through hard work and the dogged pursuit of information in the public domain.”

2) Raj Rajaratnam: His remarkable journey from Sri Lanka to the heights of the hedge-fund world to convicted felon ended in October 2011 when he was sentenced to 11 years in prison, then the longest-ever term imposed in an insider-trading case. Prosecutors said Mr. Rajaratnam, founder of Galleon Group, reaped $72 million in illegal profits and losses avoided from his insider trading. Mr. Rajaratnam’s lawyers argued that only about $7.46 million in alleged gains shouldhave been attributed to him personally.

3) Todd Newman: A former portfolio manager with Diamondback Capital Management LLC, who is currently on trial with Anthony Chiasson, a co-founder of Level Global Investors LP, for allegedly sharing and trading on confidential information about technology stocks. About $70 million in profits was made in the alleged scheme, according to prosecutors. Messrs. Newman and Chiasson have pleaded not guilty to conspiracy and securities fraud charges.

4) Ivan F. Boesky: The inspiration for Wall Street’s Gordon Gekko, Mr. Boesky was sentenced to three years in prison in 1987 for conspiring to file false stock trading records. A year earlier, he had settled civil insider-trading charges with the SEC, paying a record $100 million. The SEC said he earned more than $50 million by trading inside information he bought from an investment banker.

5) Matthew Kluger: A former corporate lawyer who profited from his inside knowledge of corporate deals handled by the law firms he worked for over a 17-year period. Mr. Kluger was sentenced in June to 12 years in prison, the current record sentence in an insider-trading case. Garrett Bauer, a 44-year-old former trader who received Mr. Kluger’s tips through a middleman, pleaded guilty in the scheme and was sentenced to nine years in prison. The scheme netted the participants $32 million in profits, the bulk to Mr. Bauer, prosecutors said.

6) Joseph “Chip” Skowron III: He was sentenced to five years in prison in November 2011 after admitting to using secret tips from a French doctor working on clinical-drug trials to avoid millions of dollars in trading losses. (Sound familiar?) A former manager at hedge fund FrontPoint Partners, Mr. Skowron directed several FrontPoint health-care funds to dump millions of dollars of shares in biotechnology company Human Genome Sciences Inc. in 2008 based on the inside information. 

He avoided about $30 million in trading losses, prosecutors said.

7) Zvi Goffer: A former employee at Galleon whom prosecutors called the “ringleader” of an insider-trading scheme involving traders and lawyers, Mr. Goffer was sentenced to 10 years in prison in 2011 after being found guilty of 14 counts of conspiracy and securities fraud. His brother Emanuel Goffer and Michael Kimelman, who were both traders, were each convicted of conspiracy and two counts of securities fraud. In a related civil complaint, the SEC said one part of the scheme, based on tips from corporate lawyers, netted more than $20 million in illegal profits

Remember that these are the once which have come out into public domain. There are hundreds which never get caught.

http://profit.ndtv.com/news/banking-finance/article-state-run-foreign-banks-hit-by-bad-loans-rbi-313160

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Partition proceedings are vitiated even if single co-sharer is not made party or is not served in accordance with law

Cause Title :  Bhagwant Singh vs  Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab, Chandigarh,  CWP-2132-2018 (O&M), High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh Date of Judgment/Order : 31.08.2022 Corum : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal Background A large parcel of land was owned by the Nagar Panchayat. Thereafter, some of the co-sharers sold their shares to third parties including the petitioners herein. On 22.11.1995, respondents No.3 to 5 filed an application for partition of the land. The petitioners were not impleaded as parties.  On completion of proceedings, sanad was issued on 28.08.1996. Vide two separate sale deeds dated 28.05.2008 respondents No.3 and 5 sold some portion in favour of respondent No.6 and 7. These respondents sought implementation of the sanad resulting in issuance of warrants of possession dated 05.06.2008. Allegedly, it was then that the petitioners realized that joint land had been partitioned and that proceedings h...
Post a Comment
Read more

Power of Attorney holder can also file cheque bounce cases: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a criminal complaint in a cheque bounce case can be filed and pursued by a person who holds a power of attorney (PoA) on behalf of the complainant. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam gave the "authoritative" pronouncement on the issue, referred to it by a division bench in view of conflicting judgements of some high courts and the apex court. "We are of the view that the power of attorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which deals with cheque bounce cases)," the bench, also comprising justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Ranjan Gogoi, said. The bench, in its judgement, said, "...we clarify the position and answer the questions in the following manner: "Filing of complaint petition under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act through PoA holder is perfectly legal...
1 comment
Read more

Christian who reconverts as Hindu SC will get quota benefits

Amid the controversy over “ghar wapsi”, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person who “reconverts” from Christianity to Hinduism shall be entitled to reservation benefits if his forefathers belonged to a Scheduled Caste and the community accepts him after “reconversion”. Citing articles by B R Ambedkar and James Massey, and reports by Mandal Commission and Chinappa Commission, the court said: “There has been detailed study to indicate the Scheduled Caste persons belonging to Hindu religion, who had embraced Christianity with some kind of hope or aspiration, have remained socially, educationally and economically backward.” The bench of Justices Dipak Misra and V Gopala Gowda held that a person shall not be deprived of reservation benefits if he decides to “reconvert” to Hinduism and adopts the caste that his forefathers originally belonged to just because he was born to Christian parents or has a Christian spouse. Expanding the scope of a previous Constitution benc...
1 comment
Read more