Skip to main content

StockGuru : The 500 crore scam or "How a sucker is born every minute".


The scam perpetrated by multi-level marketing (MLM) firm Stock Guru India (SGI)  is one more wake up call, for it exposes innumerable holes in our system of checks and balances. - such as it is.

Consider this: The Ulhas-Raksha couple used about five identities, managed to get documents such as PAN cards and driving licences in each name, opened 94 accounts in 20 different banks with 13 different names, bought 12 properties and also owned 12 luxury vehicles, according to media reports.

All these ideally should have gone through elaborate checks by so called regulators. Or are they only for the commoners?

At least, so it seems. Otherwise, how could Ulhas Prabhakar Khaire and Raksha J Urs manage to skirt all the rules and get multiple PAN cards, driving licences and passports?


Other numbers related to the scam are also mindboggling—only in Delhi about 14,000 complaints against the company and more than 2 lakh investors duped with amount ballooning to Rs. 1000 crore.

What is more surprising is the time it took for the authorities to track down the scamsters.

According to media reports, after receiving investor complaints it took more than one year for the authorities to arrest the couple, who reportedly were roaming around with bouncers in Dwarka.

Moreover, they had a highly sophisticated scheme—they conducted conferences, distributed brochures at five-star hotels and even had multiple agents across the country.

All these, under the nose of the highly alert watchdogs like Sebi and others. More surprisingly, there were suspicions raised about the company’s functions and schemes.

A report published in MoneyLife magazine in December 2010 had raised important questions about the functioning of the dubious firm.

How can Stock Guru promise 120 percent return from investing in stocks “even as leading investors like Rakesh Jhunjhunwala found it very hard to earn even 20 percent return”, it had asked.

According to the report, Stock Guru advised investors to buy shares at a low price and sell them at a higher price.

Reportedly, the couple has been arrested and investigation into scam is spreading. The Enforcement Directorate and the Serious Fraud Investigation Office are also likely join the probe. The role of some SEBI officials will also be looked into for ignoring repeated warning. An Economic Offences Wing team from Mumbai will also visit Delhi to gather more information

The company was not registered with either RBI or Sebi, both key regulators that oversee the financial sector. That highlights a bigger malaise in the system.

According to the MoneyLife report there are many MLM companies that operate without even a trading licence from the Sebi and RBI. Another issue that the scam brings into focus is lack of regulation of investment advisory firms in India.

Sebi had in 2007 come out with a draft regulation, which was revised twice later. In effect, the guidelines remain just that—the draft. The regulator has not yet been able to arrive at a consensus to finalise the guidelines.

Investors greed coupled with lack of regulations and even lackadaisical enforcement will keep such scams alive. 

It is almost the same story being repeated over and over. The company promised mouth-watering returns—Rs 22,000 on an investment of Rs 10,000 in one year. It is clear people made a beeline for the company’s schemes blindly. They did not even check the credentials of the claims Stock Guru made. According to the MoneyLife report, while Stock Guru promised a demat account with Sharekhan, the brokerage denied any such deal with it. It is to be presumed that no investor ever tried to check the veracity of this claim because of the lure of making a quick buck. 

Our country has this typical approach of being tough with the common man and if you can make yourself big enough, get the right connections, you are free. Of course we are stating the obvious here. But while it is easy  to blame the 'authorities', we also need to take a look at ourselves and ask considering that all the other scams in the past (some very recent), how different a modus-operandi could this company have offered to perpetrate this scam. Our belief is - not much. As P.T. Burnum said, "A sucker is born every minute".


Comments

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

Flat owner without legal title has consumer rights

In a significant judgment, the South Mumbai Consumer Forum has held that a flat owner legally occupying the flat would be a consumer, even if his title to the flat might be in dispute before a competent court. Thurlow owned a flat in a co-operative society. Appuswami was residing with him. In 1976, Appuswami got married in the same flat, and his wife started residing in the same flat. They had three children, born and brought up in the same flat. After Thurlow expired in 2004, Appuswami approached the High Court for inheritance to Thurlow's estate but expired while the matter was pending. His wife and children were brought on record. Subsequently, the society intervened, contending Appuswami did not have any right to the flat and it should be handed over to the Society. The Appuswami family continued to reside in the flat, and even pay the society's outgoings and maintenance charges. Later, the society stopped collecting maintenance charges from all members, as it earned...

Abusing in-laws a ground for divorce: SC

Abusing in-laws and not allowing them to reside in the matrimonial home by a woman amounts to cruelty to her spouse, ground enough for grant of divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled while allowing an NRI's plea for legal separation from his wife. A bench of Justices Vikaramajit Sen and A M Sapre said such incidents could not be termed as "wear and tear" of family life as held by Madras High Court which had said that a couple must be prepared to face such situations in matrimonial relationship. The NRI had filed a divorce petition alleging that his wife was abusive to his family members and did not allow his parents and siblings to stay in his house when they visited the US. Referring to an incident, the husband told the court that his wife had once locked him and his sister out of the house and abused them saying they belonged to a 'prostitute family'. She refused to allow her sister-in-law to enter the house and even lodged a police complaint against her hu...