Skip to main content

Consumer forum can use forensic examination to settle disputes - NCDRC

A consumer forum has to follow a summary procedure for the adjudication of complaints. But at times, the authenticity and credibility of the evidence is challenged as fabricated. In such a situation, sometimes, a consumer forum refuses to weigh a complaint on the grounds that it involves adjudication of complicated facts. It, instead, asks the parties to approach the regular civil court. This is incorrect.

In such a case, a consumer forum isn't helpless; it can obtain evidence by referring the documents for examination by experts. This significant ruling was given by a National Commission bench of judges K S Chaudhari and Suresh Chandra in revision petition number 2008 of 2012 on February 11, 2012 (The New India Assurance Co Ltd v/s Sree Sree Madan Mohan Rice Mill).

The rice mill claimed a fire had broken out at its office-cum-manufacturing unit. An insurance claim was lodged for the loss. The insurance company didn't settle the claim. Aggrieved, the mill filed a complaint before the West Bengal State Commission, claiming a compensation of Rs 99 lakh.

To support and substantiate its claim, the mill relied on photographs of the fire and the loss it had caused. The insurance company questioned the authenticity of photographs, alleging these had been manipulated and fabricated. It claimed the investigator appointed had approached the Central Forensic Laboratory to examine the photographs, but the laboratory had declined to examine those, unless the police or judicial authorities requested such a move. Therefore, the insurer urged the State Commission to refer the photographs to the laboratory for forensic examination.

The mill opposed this application, claiming the surveyor hadn't raised any doubt about the photographs; neither had the insurance company made such an allegation in its reply filed before the State Commission. The mill contended the application was aimed merely at delaying proceedings. Upholding the mill's contention, the State Commission rejected the insurance company's application.

Subsequently, the insurance company filed a revision petition before the National Commission, challenging the State Commission's refusal to refer the photographs for examination.

The National Commission said the insurance company had alleged the photographs had been tampered and manufactured by super-imposing one photograph over another so that a claim could be made. These photographs were taken by the mill owner, not by an independent person. Even if the surveyor didn't question the genuineness of the photographs, the insurance company's primary defence was its challenge to the photographs' credibility. Under such circumstances, the National Commission said the application filed by the insurance company shouldn't have been rejected.

Further, it said the Consumer Protection Act empowered redressal tribunals to seek the report of an analyst from an appropriate laboratory. If the photographs were referred to the laboratory for forensic examination, it would help in arriving at a correct conclusion, it added.

With this, the National Commission set aside the State Commission's order and directed it to send the disputed photographs to the Central Forensic Science Laboratory for examination. Since the insurance company had disputed the validity of the photographs, the commission directed it to bear the cost of the examination.

This judgment is significant: Even in cases in which documentary evidence is disputed, a consumer forum has the power to adjudicate the complaint by seeking a report from a competent laboratory. The cost of such an examination wouldn't be a burden on the consumer, as it would have to be borne by the party that challenges the document's validity. If the document is found to be false or fabricated, the consumer would definitely be penalised.

Article referred: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pf/consumer-forum-can-use-forensic-examination-to-settle-disputes-113062400015_1.html

Comments

  1. Unknown2 July 2013 at 13:05

    Even in cases within which documentary proof is controversial, a client forum has the ability to adjudicate the grievance by seeking a report from a competent laboratory.

    Thanks
    William Martin

    Financial Claims Made Simple

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

One Sided Clauses In Builder-Buyer Agreements Is An Unfair Trade Practice

In CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12238 OF 2018, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. vs Govindan Raghavan, an appeal was filed before the Supreme Court  by the builder against the order of the National Consumer Forum. The builder had relied upon various clauses of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement to refute the claim of the respondent but was rejected by the commission which found the said clauses as wholly one-sided, unfair and unreasonable, and could not be relied upon. The Supreme Court on perusal of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement found stark incongruities between the remedies available to both the parties. For example, Clause 6.4 (ii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to charge Interest @18% p.a. on account of any delay in payment of installments from the Respondent – Flat Purchaser. Clause 6.4 (iii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to cancel the allotment and terminate the Agreement, if any installment remains in arrears for more than 30 da...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inherited property of childless hindu woman devolve onto heirs of her parents

In Tarabai Dagdu Nitanware vs Narayan Keru Nitanware, quashing an order passed by a joint civil judge junior division, Pune, the Bombay High Court has held that under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother, will devolve upon the heirs of her father/mother, if she dies without any children of her own, and not upon her husband. Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing a writ petition filed by relatives of one Sundarabai, who died issueless more than 45 years ago on June 18, 1962. Article referred:http://www.livelaw.in/property-inherited-female-hindu-parents-shall-devolve-upon-heirs-father-not-husband-dies-childless-bombay-hc-read-judgment/
Post a Comment
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more