Skip to main content

Power firms can't change meters unilaterally: HC

A power company cannot unilaterally change a consumer's electricity meter because it suspects the instrument is defective, the Bombay high court has ruledin an important order.

Putting the reins on power companies, Justice Ashok Bhangale, while hearing a two-decade-old case, said that if there was a dispute about the working of a meter, in the absence of allegations of fraud against the consumer, the matter has to be referred to the electricity inspector. Moreover, the inspector can decide on additional charges only for a period up to six months prior to when the dispute was raised.

"Provisions of the Indian Electricity Act manifest that the original correct meter once installed acquires a sacrosanct status. After installation, both parties cannot remove or replace the meter," said the judge.

The court said that if the power company or consumer suspects that a meter is defective, then the matter should be brought before the electricity inspector. The company will not be permitted to replace the meter until its correctness is decided by the officer.

"Doubts about a defective meter must be finally scrutinized and decided by the electrical inspector on a reference made to such authority. The board [Maharashtra State Electricity Board] should not be permitted to instal another meter simply by doubting the correctness of the earlier meter installed by it," said the judge. "Any proposal of substitution of one meter by another should not be permitted until the correctness of the installed meter is decided by electrical inspector as incorrect. Any liberty granted to the board to continue to dislodge and dislocate one meter after another meter unreasonably, arbitrarily , whimsically and without the concurrence of the consumer will encourage mischief and high-handedness of the board and such action is bound to seriously impair the rule of law between the parties."

The court was hearing a dispute that dates back to 1993, when the Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) issued a notice to Thane-based Hindustan Gas Industries Ltd (HGIL) asking it to pay additional charges as the meter was found to be slow and threatened to disconnect the power supply within 24 hours. HGIL challenged the letter, which was struck down by the civil court in 1999. MSEB challenged the order in the high court.

The court said that the law makes it clear that if a dispute is raised, the limit set is six months prior and the meter reading before that cut-off date is presumed to be correct.

 Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/Power-firms-cant-change-meters-unilaterally-HC/articleshow/22955002.cms

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Appellate authorities under Special Statutes cannot be asked to condone delay

Madras High Court in R.Gowrishankar vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax has held that Appellate authorities cannot be asked to condone the delay, beyond the extended period of limitation A Division Bench comprising of Justices S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, made this observation while considering an appeal filed against Single Bench order declining to set aside the order made in the condone delay petition filed by the petitioner to condone 223 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). Article referred: http://www.livelaw.in/appellate-authorities-special-statutes-cannot-asked-condone-delay-beyond-extended-period-limitation-madras-hc/
Post a Comment
Read more

'Seize assets to pay damages to accident victim'

Her story might be an inspiration for the physically challenged but justice has remained elusive for her. In 2008, a bus accident left research engineer S Thenmozhi, 30, paraplegic. In April 2013, the motor accident claims tribunal directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC) to provide her a compensation of 57.9 lakh. However, TNSTC refused to budge and on Tuesday a city court ordered attaching of movable assets of the transport corporation. Thenmozhi was employed in C-DOT, a telecom technology development centre in Bangalore. On July 21, 2008, she was coming to Chennai in a private bus. Around 2am, the bus had a flat tyre and the driver parked it on the left side of the road near Pallikonda in Vellore district on the Bangalore-Chennai highway. While the tyre was being changed, a TNSTC bus of Dharmapuri division hit the stationary bus. The rear part of the bus was smashed and passengers were injured. Thenmozhi who had a seat at the back of the bus suffered...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai ITAT rules income of offshore discretionary trust is subject to tax in India

The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently determined the following issue in the affirmative in the case of Manoj Dhupelia: Should the income of an offshore discretionary trust be subject to tax in India, if no distributions have been made to beneficiaries in India? The question arose from appeals filed by individual beneficiaries in relation to a Lichtenstein-based trust, the Ambrunova Trust and Merlyn Management SA (the Trust) with the ITAT. It is important to note that the individuals in this case were amongst those first identified by the Government of India (GOI) as holding undeclared bank accounts in Lichtenstein. The ITAT ruling raises the following issues: Taxation of Trust Corpus: ITAT classified the corpus of the trust as "undisclosed income" and declared it taxable in the hands of the beneficiaries. Taxation of Undistributed Income: ITAT refused to draw a distinction between the corpus and undistributed income from the trust and declared i...
Post a Comment
Read more