Skip to main content

Dr LH Hiranandani Hospital slapped with fine of 3.8 crore by CCI

Dr LH Hiranandani Hospital in Mumbai has been slapped with a fine of Rs. 3.8 crore for anti-competitive practices by the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the first time the increasingly assertive anti-trust regulator has penalised a hospital .

The CCI said the super-specialty hospital's exclusive agreement with stem cell banking company Cryobanks International India limited consumer choice and had the potential to mould consumer preferences and distort the market mechanism completely in the long run . "Such agreements notonly affect the competition adversely but are also against the spirit of health services and affectfreetradebesidesbeing anti-consumer ," the CCI said in its order .

The action against Hiranandani is basedon a complaintfiledlast year by Ramakant Kini , a lawyer and family friend of Mumbai resident M Anu Jain,who was denied maternity services by the hospital during the 38 th week of her pregnancy becauseshe refused to avail the services of Cryobanks . Jain preferred the stem cell banking services of Cryobanks ' main rival , Lifecell International , as she did during the birth of her first child .

The CCI observed that "there is an onerous responsibility on hospitals to behave ethically towards patients". Thanks to its punitive action , the CCI may have established itself as a quasiwatchdog in the grossly under-regulated Indian healthcare sector. The penalty has set a precedent for patients to complain against abuse of monopoly and exploitation by hospitals and other healthcare service providers , according to experts .

"The order signals the CCI's deep concern against anti-competitive and anti-consumer practices in a vital sector such as health services ," said Vinod Dhall , former CCI chairman . Dhall heads Vinod Dhall-TT &A, a legal firm specialising in competition law that represented Kini . Companies like Lifecell and Cryobanks collect, process and store blood from umbilicalcord— rich in stem cells — in the moments after birth . Stem cells are used in medical treatments .

Article referred: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CCI-fines-Hiranandani-Hospital-Rs-5040907.S.5848028311690694658?view=&gid=5040907&type=member&item=5848028311690694658&trk=eml-anet_dig-b_nd-pst_ttle-cn

Comment:

An amniotic stem cell bank is a facility that stores stem cells derived from amniotic fluid for future use. Stem cell samples in private (or family) banks are stored specifically for use by the individual person from whom such cells have been collected and the banking costs are paid by such person. The sample can later be retrieved only by that individual and for the use by such individual or, in many cases, by her or his first-degree blood relatives. In case of amniotic fluid stem cell banking, the mother providing the donation initially has ownership of the stem cells and financial responsibility for its storage. When the child from that pregnancy reaches legal age, the ownership and responsibility for the sample may be transferred. The first private amniotic stem cell bank in the US was opened by Biocell Center in October 2009 in Medford, Massachusetts.

Comments

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

Amendment of plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC explained

Cause Title :  Ganesh Prasad vs Rajeshwar Prasad, SLP (C) NO. 28377 OF 2018, Supreme Court Of India Date of Judgment/Order : 14/3/2023 Corum : J. B. Pardiwala, J. Citied:  Revajeetu Builders and Developers v. Narayanaswamy & Sons and Others reported in (2009) 10 SCC 84 North Eastern Railway Administration, Gorakhpur v. Bhagwan Das reported in (2008) 8 SCC 511 P.A. Jayalakshmi v. H. Saradha and Others reported in (2009) 14 SCC 525 B.K. Narayana Pillai v. Parameswaran Pillai and Another reported in (2000) 1 SCC 712 A.K. Gupta and Sons Ltd. v. Damodar Valley Corporation reported in AIR 1967 SC 96 Life Insurance Corporation of India v. Sanjeev Builders Private Limited and Another, Civil Appeal No. 5909 of 2022 dated 01.09.2022 Firm Sriniwas Ram Kumar v. Mahabir Prasad and Others reported in AIR 1951 SC 177 G. Nagamma and Another v. Siromanamma and Another reported in (1996) 2 SCC 25 Praful Manohar Rele v. Krishnabai Narayan Ghosalkar and Others reported in (2014...

Owner of vehicle is not expected to verify the genuineness of the driving license before appointing a driver

Cause Title : Rishi Pal Singh Versus New India Assurance Co. Ltd & Ors., Civil Appeal No. 4919 Of 2022, The Supreme Court Of India Date of Judgment/Order : July 26, 2022 Corum : Hemant Gupta; J., Vikram Nath; J. Background the truck owned by the appellant met with an accident. The owner deposed before the court that before employing the driver, he had taken his driving test and that he was driving the vehicle satisfactorily and  that the driver was employed with him for 3 years before the date of the accident. He produced his driving license. This was reaffirmed by the driver who deposed that the driving license was obtained from the driver and it was issued from Nagaland, but no such license was produced on record. Both the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the High Court have held that the owner has alleged that the driver had a driving license from Nagaland but the same was not produced and therefore, the Insurance Company is entitled to recover the awarded amount...