Skip to main content

Whether Document Obtained Under RTI Act Can Be Accepted As Evidence, After A Lapse Of 18 Years

While the above can be treated as a secondary question, one more question which arose before the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala in a recent case of R Romi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Thiruvananthapuram reported in 2014- TOIL-424-HC-KERALA-IT was whether a block assessment can be completed without issuing a notice u/s 143[2] of the Indian Income Tax Act. Briefing down the facts of the case, pursuant to a search U/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assesse was assessed U/s 143(3) of Income Tax Act read with Section 158BC, for the block period of almost ten years commencing from 01.04.1985 to 15.09.1995. Notice under Section 158BC was issued to the Assessee on 25.06.1996. The Assessee filed a NIL return of income and subsequently the AO passed an order U/s 143(3) read with Section 158 BC determining the total undisclosed income at Rs. 9, 55, 380/- and demanding income tax of Rs. 5, 73, 228/-.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL:

On appeal before the Tribunal it was contended by the Assessee that since no notice U/s 143(2) was issued, the entire assessment should have been set aside. However the Tribunal was of the view that the Assessee was subjected to search in the year 1995 and the appeal was being head afresh in 2013, therefore the possibility of misplacing the 143(2) notice cannot be ruled out in this span of almost 18 years. It was also observed that the Assessee did not urge this legal issue at the time of filing the appeal before the Tribunal, but urged for the first time before us after a lapse of considerable years. The Tribunal reduced the addition to a limited extent.

PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA:

Aggrieved with the order of the Tribunal, the Assessee had appealed with the Hon'ble High Court of Kerala wherein he produced a document based on the Right to Information Act, which suggests that no such notice was issued. The Hon'ble Court also requested the standing counsel of the Department to verify the correctness of the information received in the RTI to which the counsel fairly submitted that the information was correct and no notice was issued under Section 143(2).
The two main questions which arose are reiterated below:
1. Whether block assessment could have been completed without issuing notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act and whether such omission would be a procedural irregularity or is curable?
2. Whether document obtained under Right to Information Act for establishing the non issuance of notice u/s 143(2) can be accepted as evidence, although there has been a lapse of 18 years since the search was first conducted.
After going through the Section 143(2) of the Act and relying on the judgment of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. V, Hotel Blue Moon, reported in [2010] 321 ITR 362, the Court came to the conclusion that there was no dispute that in order to make an assessment under Section 143(3) read with Section 158 BC, notice should be issued U/s 143(2) and omission to issue such a notice is not a procedural irregularity and is not curable.
Further, as it was also accepted by the Department that no such notice was issued, the Hon'ble High Court allowed the appeal in favor of the Assessee and set aside the order of the Tribunal and the Assessing officer.

Article referred: http://www.mondaq.com/india/x/311412/disclosure+electronic+discovery+privilege/Whether+Document+Obtained+Under+Right+To+Information+Act+Can+Be+Accepted+As+Evidence+After+A+Lapse+Of+18+Years

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more

When debt is bona fide disputed and the defence is a substantial one, the court will not wind up the company

In SHITAL FIBERS LTD.  vs  INDIAN ACRYLICS LIMITED, as per the respondent, appellant had made a payment of Rs.61,83,218/­. However, there was an outstanding balance of Rs.8,92,723/­ as on 28.7.2008. Since despite repeated requests, balance amount was not paid, the respondent issued a statutory notice to the appellant. The same was duly responded to. As the payment was not made despite notice being duly served on the appellant, the respondent filed the aforesaid Company Petition seeking winding up of the present appellant for its inability to pay admitted debts. The learned Company Judge vide order dated 28.9.2015 admitted the Company Petition. However, while doing so, the learned Company Judge observed, that since the appellant was an on­going concern, an opportunity should be granted to it to settle the accounts with the respondent by 31.12.2015. Only in case of failure of the settlement, the citation was directed to be published. On appeal, the Division Bench of the High Cou...
Post a Comment
Read more

Abusing in-laws a ground for divorce: SC

Abusing in-laws and not allowing them to reside in the matrimonial home by a woman amounts to cruelty to her spouse, ground enough for grant of divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled while allowing an NRI's plea for legal separation from his wife. A bench of Justices Vikaramajit Sen and A M Sapre said such incidents could not be termed as "wear and tear" of family life as held by Madras High Court which had said that a couple must be prepared to face such situations in matrimonial relationship. The NRI had filed a divorce petition alleging that his wife was abusive to his family members and did not allow his parents and siblings to stay in his house when they visited the US. Referring to an incident, the husband told the court that his wife had once locked him and his sister out of the house and abused them saying they belonged to a 'prostitute family'. She refused to allow her sister-in-law to enter the house and even lodged a police complaint against her hu...
4 comments
Read more