Skip to main content

Court fines women who faked evidence to get accident claim - Madras HC

The two widows perhaps had good reason to claim compensation after their husbands died in a hit-and-run case. But in the absence of evidence to buttress their claim, they resorted to deception and succeeded in receiving a combined compensation of 14.5 lakh. But after their fraud was exposed, the Madras high court has quashed the claim.

On May 5, 2005 at 4.30pm Stephen Chelladurai was riding a bike with N Illangovan on the pillion. They were going from the city to Chengalpet when near Peramanur village on GST Road they were hit by an unidentified vehicle driven in a rash manner. Chelladurai died on the spot while IIangovan succumbed to injuries on his way to a hospital.

The next year, Chelladurai's wife Chitra and Illangovan's wife E Pushparani approached the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) stating an auto belonging to A R Iyappan and driven by A R Boobalan was the vehicle which caused the accident. After investigation, S Krishnan, inspector, MM Nagar police station confirmed the auto was involved in the accident. MACT in August 2011, provided compensation of 7.32 lakh to Chitra and 7.28 lakh to Pushparani.

Against the order, United India Insurance, Royapettah, filed an appeal in the Madras high court. After granting an interim stay in February, the court in July 2012 said a chargesheet had not been filed against the driver. It then directed the superintendent of police, Kancheepuram to investigate and file a report.

On March, 5, 2014, the district crime branch submitted its report stating the wives of the victims had made a false complaint. The report also said the police had filed a chargesheet against the owner of the auto, the auto driver, the wives and the police inspector on charges of fraud. There was a collusion between the accused to defraud the insurance company, said the report, adding while the owner had been arrested, others remained absconding.

Explaining the "apparent fraud," Justice S Manikumar said the forensic department had said the injuries were severe and could not have been caused by an auto. The auto involved in the accident was sold four days after the accident and found to be fit by RTO authorities. As such there was a nexus between the accused who "played a fraud in making a bogus claim" and "roped in the auto."

Rapping the tribunal for allowing the claim, the court said "it is the duty of the tribunal to examine the evidence thoroughly..." The court slapped the two women with a fine of 10,000 each and rejected their plea to file a special leave petition in the Supreme Court against its order.

There was a nexus between the accused who "played a fraud in making a bogus claim" and "roped in the auto.

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Chennai/Court-fines-women-who-faked-evidence-to-get-accident-claim/articleshow/37226093.cms

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Michigan House Approves 'Right-to-Work' Bill

Amid raucous protests, the Republican-led Michigan House approved a contentious right-to-work bill on  Dec 11 limiting unions' strength in the state where the (Union for American Auto Workers)  UAW was born. The chamber passed a measure dealing with public-sector workers 58-51 as protesters shouted "shame on you" from the gallery and huge crowds of union backers massed in the state Capitol halls and on the grounds. Backers said a right-to-work law would bring more jobs to Michigan and give workers freedom. Critics said it would drive down wages and benefits. The right-to-work movement has been growing in the country since Wisconsin fought a similar battle with unions over two years ago. Michigan would become the 24th state to enact right-to-work provisions, and passage of the legislation would deal a stunning blow to the power of organized labor in the United States. Wisconsin Republicans in 2011 passed laws severely restricting the power of public s...
Post a Comment
Read more

Power to re-assess by AO and disclosure of material facts

In AVTEC Limited v. DCIT, the division of the Delhi High Court held that AO is bound to look at the litigation history of the assessee and cannot expect the assessee to inform him.  In the instant case, the Petitioner, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of automobiles, power trains and power shift transmissions along with their components, approached the High Court challenging the re-assessment order passed against them. For the year 2006-07, the Petitioner entered into a Business Transfer Agreement with Hindustan Motors Ltd, as per which, the Petitioner took over the business from HML.  While filing income tax return for the said year, the petitioner claimed the expenses incurred in respect of professional and legal charges for the purpose of taking over of the business from HML as capital expenses and claimed depreciation. Article referred: http://www.taxscan.in/assessing-officer-bound-look-litigation-history-assessee-delhi-hc-read-order/8087/
Post a Comment
Read more

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more