Skip to main content

Forgers Deserve to Get their Fingers Chopped, Says Judge

Persons forging property documents deserve the punishment of chopping off the fingers as in Iran, Madras High Court has observed. “But there is no law to that effect in our country,” regretted Justice SVaidynathan on Thursday.

The judge said Iran has unveiled its latest innovation in criminal punishment - a machine that cuts off fingers of thieves. It is being used for chopping off the fingers of culprits by a court of Shiraz. For having committed forgery of property document in the case on hand, this court is of the view that such a punishment should be awarded to the petitioner.

The judge, however, imposed a huge cost of `1 lakh on PM Elavarasan of Kottur, the petitioner, who prayed for a direction to the Sub-Registrar in Virugambakkam to release the sale deed presented by him on April 17, 2013 upon assigning a registration number.

After collecting the cost amount, the Registry should issue four cheques for `25,000 each in favour of the Cancer Institute in Adyar, Govt. Higher Secondary School for the Blind in Karaiyan Chavadi, Vidya Sagar of Kotturpuram and YRG Centre for AIDS Research for Education in the City. This exercise should be completed within a month.

Conceding the contentions of addvocate S Thanka Sivan for VVV Nachiappan, whose land in Kumaran Colony in Vadapalani has been forged by the petitioner, the judge wondered at the audacity of the petitioner in approaching the HC with a writ petition when the Registering Authority had withheld the document. The action of the petitioner is highly deprecated  and hence, warranted imposition of heavy costs.

Persons like the petitioner who indulged in such illegal activities should be dealt with iron hands, the judge added and hoped that the court  concerned, would award the maximum sentence in the event of the charges being proved against the petitioner.

The judge also observed that it is really shocking as to how these kind of forged documents are being created in the office of the Sub-Registrars. No doubt, it is only with the help of the officials of the Sub-Registrar’s office, the judge said. If the laws are rigid and deterrent, the criminals cannot dare to indulge in such illegal activities,’’ the judge said.

Article referred: http://m.newindianexpress.com/tamil-nadu/335484?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=forgers-deserve-to-get-their-fingers-chopped-says-judge

Comment: With all due respect to his lordship, we have only one comment to add. "Chop off his fingers !!!"  - Really????

Comments

Most viewed this month

Valuation Report of Jewellery once made is effective for Four Assessment Years

The division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Pr.Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs. Raghu Hari Dalmia held that a valuation report made by a registered valuer once adopted shall be in effect for four assessment years unless an event has occurred whereby the value is increased or decreased. The High Court made it clear that the event of “search” under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot compel the assessee to undertake a fresh valuation.

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

Mere Agreement To Sell The Leased Property To Tenant Would Not Terminate Landlord-Tenant Relationship

In CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 1237­1238 OF 2019, Dr. H.K. Sharma vs Shri Ram Lal, the tenant had objected against the eviction suit filed by the landlord, claiming that the landlord-tenant relationship between them had ceased to exist by virtue of an agreement for sale entered between them and that he has already paid some money in advance based on the agreement. The tenant contented as the landlord-tenant relationship did not exist, the landlord cannot evict him. The matter went through various forums and finally landed before the Supreme Court in appeal. The Supreme Court referring to the judgment in Shah Mathuradas Maganlal & Co. vs. Nagappa Shankarappa Malage & Ors., held that in the instant case the lease agreement included no clauses on the fate of the tenancy. A fortiori, the parties did not intend to surrender the tenancy rights despite entering into an agreement of sale of the tenanted property. In other words, if the parties really intended to surrender their tenancy ...