Skip to main content

Insurance company to settle full claim of vehicle owner

The Nashik consumer court has ordered Satpur-based New India Insurance Company to settle the entire claim filed by a man, whose vehicle was irretrievable after falling into a 400-ft deep gorge in 2011.

Shantaram Thorat, a resident of Panchale in Sinnar, owned a tempo and had insured it for Rs 9.59 lakh. The vehicle was being used as a goods carrier. On October 30, 2011, the vehicle was on its way to the city from Mumbai, when the driver lost control over it after another vehicle veered along its way without any signal. The driver somehow managed to jump out of the tempo, but the vehicle plunged into the gorge in Igatpuri.

Later, Thorat tried to retrieve the vehicle but in vain. In February 2012, he filed the insurance claim with company seeking the entire amount. However, the company gave him only Rs 6 lakh and refused to provide the remaining amount saying that since the vehicle was not retrieved, the entire claim could not be settled.

"My client filed the claim, but the company refused by saying that the vehicle had to be presented for such claims. Thorat had presented certificates from the Igatpuri Municipal Council's fire brigade department and two crane service organizations saying that the vehicle could not be retrieved," said KN Aher, Thorat's lawyer.

Thereafter, Thorat approached the consumer court and filed a complaint against the company. He had sought complete settlement of the claim as well as interest on the pending amount. Taking cognizance of the complaint, the court sent a notice to the insurance company asking it to reply to it.

"The company did not make its presentation in the consumer court. Hence, the court ordered the company to settle the claim with interest and compensation for harassing Thorat," Aher said.

The court has ordered the company to pay Rs 3.59 lakh along with 10% and a compensation of Rs 3,000 to Thorat.

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Nashik/Insurance-company-to-settle-full-claim-of-vehicle-owner/articleshow/40864708.cms

Comments

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

Valuation Report of Jewellery once made is effective for Four Assessment Years

The division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Pr.Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs. Raghu Hari Dalmia held that a valuation report made by a registered valuer once adopted shall be in effect for four assessment years unless an event has occurred whereby the value is increased or decreased. The High Court made it clear that the event of “search” under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot compel the assessee to undertake a fresh valuation.

Mere Agreement To Sell The Leased Property To Tenant Would Not Terminate Landlord-Tenant Relationship

In CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 1237­1238 OF 2019, Dr. H.K. Sharma vs Shri Ram Lal, the tenant had objected against the eviction suit filed by the landlord, claiming that the landlord-tenant relationship between them had ceased to exist by virtue of an agreement for sale entered between them and that he has already paid some money in advance based on the agreement. The tenant contented as the landlord-tenant relationship did not exist, the landlord cannot evict him. The matter went through various forums and finally landed before the Supreme Court in appeal. The Supreme Court referring to the judgment in Shah Mathuradas Maganlal & Co. vs. Nagappa Shankarappa Malage & Ors., held that in the instant case the lease agreement included no clauses on the fate of the tenancy. A fortiori, the parties did not intend to surrender the tenancy rights despite entering into an agreement of sale of the tenanted property. In other words, if the parties really intended to surrender their tenancy ...