Skip to main content

Insurance company to settle full claim of vehicle owner

The Nashik consumer court has ordered Satpur-based New India Insurance Company to settle the entire claim filed by a man, whose vehicle was irretrievable after falling into a 400-ft deep gorge in 2011.

Shantaram Thorat, a resident of Panchale in Sinnar, owned a tempo and had insured it for Rs 9.59 lakh. The vehicle was being used as a goods carrier. On October 30, 2011, the vehicle was on its way to the city from Mumbai, when the driver lost control over it after another vehicle veered along its way without any signal. The driver somehow managed to jump out of the tempo, but the vehicle plunged into the gorge in Igatpuri.

Later, Thorat tried to retrieve the vehicle but in vain. In February 2012, he filed the insurance claim with company seeking the entire amount. However, the company gave him only Rs 6 lakh and refused to provide the remaining amount saying that since the vehicle was not retrieved, the entire claim could not be settled.

"My client filed the claim, but the company refused by saying that the vehicle had to be presented for such claims. Thorat had presented certificates from the Igatpuri Municipal Council's fire brigade department and two crane service organizations saying that the vehicle could not be retrieved," said KN Aher, Thorat's lawyer.

Thereafter, Thorat approached the consumer court and filed a complaint against the company. He had sought complete settlement of the claim as well as interest on the pending amount. Taking cognizance of the complaint, the court sent a notice to the insurance company asking it to reply to it.

"The company did not make its presentation in the consumer court. Hence, the court ordered the company to settle the claim with interest and compensation for harassing Thorat," Aher said.

The court has ordered the company to pay Rs 3.59 lakh along with 10% and a compensation of Rs 3,000 to Thorat.

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Nashik/Insurance-company-to-settle-full-claim-of-vehicle-owner/articleshow/40864708.cms

Comments

Most viewed this month

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.

No Rebate For Stamp Duty Paid In Another State - Bombay HC

A three judge bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court (Bombay HC) in a recent judgment in the matter of Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune and Superintendent of Stamp (Headquarters), Mumbai v Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai and Reliance Petroleum Limited, Gujarat1 has held that orders in case of a scheme of arrangement under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) involving different High Courts in multiple states, are separate instruments in themselves. Accordingly, stamp duty would be payable on all the orders (and consequently, all the states) without the benefit of remission, rebate or set-off.

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...