Skip to main content

Non-lodging of FIR within 7 days in vehicle theft fatal - Consumer Forum

A man's plea seeking claim from an insurance company for loss of his vehicle parts has been dismissed by a consumer forum, which said failure to lodge an FIR for a "period of seven days in case of theft of a vehicle is fatal".

While rejecting the plea of Delhi resident Kishan Chand, against National Insurance Co Ltd, West Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, presided by Bimla Makin, said, "There were serious doubts about the genuineness of this claim".

"Non-lodging of the FIR for a period of seven days in the case of theft of a vehicle is fatal and adversely affects the rights of the Opposite Party (insurance company) and under facts and circumstances of this case, there are serious doubts about the genuineness of this claim.

"Hence...We hold that complaint is time barred and even otherwise there was no deficiency of service on the part of the Opposite Party," the forum said.

It noted there were lots of unanswered queries regarding loss and recovery of vehicle.

"It is difficult to believe that under what circumstances the vehicle was stolen and how it was recovered by the complainant himself in another state without any assistance from anybody," the forum said.

The forum also noted that there was no witness of recovery of this vehicle from the place from where it is alleged to have been recovered.

"...Story put forward by the complainant is not believable per se and added with it is the fact that for seven days neither the police nor the insurance company was informed of the theft of the vehicle," it said.

Chand had told the forum that he had purchased a Maruti Omni fitted with CNG kit for commercial purpose to be used as taxi.

The vehicle was insured with the insurance company, effective from December 29, 2006 to December 28, 2007 and during this period it got stolen on November 23, 2007 and an FIR was recorded on November 30, 2007.

Later, however, he found the vehicle abandoned at Tawadu, Haryana with all its important parts stolen.

The complainant got the vehicle repaired and spent Rs one lakh towards repairs/ installation of stolen parts and subsequently lodged a claim with the the company on December 24, 2007.

Inspite of repeated visits, his claim was not settled, he said, adding that, thereafter, he approached the forum seeking a direction to the company to pay Rs lakh.

The insurance company, however, contended before the forum that no FIR regarding the theft was lodged at the police station within seven days and no intimation was given to it.

Article referred: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/non-lodging-of-fir-within-7-days-in-vehicle-theft-fatal-114082500631_1.html

Comments

Most viewed this month

Michigan House Approves 'Right-to-Work' Bill

Amid raucous protests, the Republican-led Michigan House approved a contentious right-to-work bill on  Dec 11 limiting unions' strength in the state where the (Union for American Auto Workers)  UAW was born. The chamber passed a measure dealing with public-sector workers 58-51 as protesters shouted "shame on you" from the gallery and huge crowds of union backers massed in the state Capitol halls and on the grounds. Backers said a right-to-work law would bring more jobs to Michigan and give workers freedom. Critics said it would drive down wages and benefits. The right-to-work movement has been growing in the country since Wisconsin fought a similar battle with unions over two years ago. Michigan would become the 24th state to enact right-to-work provisions, and passage of the legislation would deal a stunning blow to the power of organized labor in the United States. Wisconsin Republicans in 2011 passed laws severely restricting the power of public s...

Power to re-assess by AO and disclosure of material facts

In AVTEC Limited v. DCIT, the division of the Delhi High Court held that AO is bound to look at the litigation history of the assessee and cannot expect the assessee to inform him.  In the instant case, the Petitioner, engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling of automobiles, power trains and power shift transmissions along with their components, approached the High Court challenging the re-assessment order passed against them. For the year 2006-07, the Petitioner entered into a Business Transfer Agreement with Hindustan Motors Ltd, as per which, the Petitioner took over the business from HML.  While filing income tax return for the said year, the petitioner claimed the expenses incurred in respect of professional and legal charges for the purpose of taking over of the business from HML as capital expenses and claimed depreciation. Article referred: http://www.taxscan.in/assessing-officer-bound-look-litigation-history-assessee-delhi-hc-read-order/8087/

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...