Skip to main content

Non-lodging of FIR within 7 days in vehicle theft fatal - Consumer Forum

A man's plea seeking claim from an insurance company for loss of his vehicle parts has been dismissed by a consumer forum, which said failure to lodge an FIR for a "period of seven days in case of theft of a vehicle is fatal".

While rejecting the plea of Delhi resident Kishan Chand, against National Insurance Co Ltd, West Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, presided by Bimla Makin, said, "There were serious doubts about the genuineness of this claim".

"Non-lodging of the FIR for a period of seven days in the case of theft of a vehicle is fatal and adversely affects the rights of the Opposite Party (insurance company) and under facts and circumstances of this case, there are serious doubts about the genuineness of this claim.

"Hence...We hold that complaint is time barred and even otherwise there was no deficiency of service on the part of the Opposite Party," the forum said.

It noted there were lots of unanswered queries regarding loss and recovery of vehicle.

"It is difficult to believe that under what circumstances the vehicle was stolen and how it was recovered by the complainant himself in another state without any assistance from anybody," the forum said.

The forum also noted that there was no witness of recovery of this vehicle from the place from where it is alleged to have been recovered.

"...Story put forward by the complainant is not believable per se and added with it is the fact that for seven days neither the police nor the insurance company was informed of the theft of the vehicle," it said.

Chand had told the forum that he had purchased a Maruti Omni fitted with CNG kit for commercial purpose to be used as taxi.

The vehicle was insured with the insurance company, effective from December 29, 2006 to December 28, 2007 and during this period it got stolen on November 23, 2007 and an FIR was recorded on November 30, 2007.

Later, however, he found the vehicle abandoned at Tawadu, Haryana with all its important parts stolen.

The complainant got the vehicle repaired and spent Rs one lakh towards repairs/ installation of stolen parts and subsequently lodged a claim with the the company on December 24, 2007.

Inspite of repeated visits, his claim was not settled, he said, adding that, thereafter, he approached the forum seeking a direction to the company to pay Rs lakh.

The insurance company, however, contended before the forum that no FIR regarding the theft was lodged at the police station within seven days and no intimation was given to it.

Article referred: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/non-lodging-of-fir-within-7-days-in-vehicle-theft-fatal-114082500631_1.html

Comments

Most viewed this month

Partition proceedings are vitiated even if single co-sharer is not made party or is not served in accordance with law

Cause Title :  Bhagwant Singh vs  Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab, Chandigarh,  CWP-2132-2018 (O&M), High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh Date of Judgment/Order : 31.08.2022 Corum : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal Background A large parcel of land was owned by the Nagar Panchayat. Thereafter, some of the co-sharers sold their shares to third parties including the petitioners herein. On 22.11.1995, respondents No.3 to 5 filed an application for partition of the land. The petitioners were not impleaded as parties.  On completion of proceedings, sanad was issued on 28.08.1996. Vide two separate sale deeds dated 28.05.2008 respondents No.3 and 5 sold some portion in favour of respondent No.6 and 7. These respondents sought implementation of the sanad resulting in issuance of warrants of possession dated 05.06.2008. Allegedly, it was then that the petitioners realized that joint land had been partitioned and that proceedings h...

Power of Attorney holder can also file cheque bounce cases: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a criminal complaint in a cheque bounce case can be filed and pursued by a person who holds a power of attorney (PoA) on behalf of the complainant. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam gave the "authoritative" pronouncement on the issue, referred to it by a division bench in view of conflicting judgements of some high courts and the apex court. "We are of the view that the power of attorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which deals with cheque bounce cases)," the bench, also comprising justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Ranjan Gogoi, said. The bench, in its judgement, said, "...we clarify the position and answer the questions in the following manner: "Filing of complaint petition under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act through PoA holder is perfectly legal...

Christian who reconverts as Hindu SC will get quota benefits

Amid the controversy over “ghar wapsi”, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person who “reconverts” from Christianity to Hinduism shall be entitled to reservation benefits if his forefathers belonged to a Scheduled Caste and the community accepts him after “reconversion”. Citing articles by B R Ambedkar and James Massey, and reports by Mandal Commission and Chinappa Commission, the court said: “There has been detailed study to indicate the Scheduled Caste persons belonging to Hindu religion, who had embraced Christianity with some kind of hope or aspiration, have remained socially, educationally and economically backward.” The bench of Justices Dipak Misra and V Gopala Gowda held that a person shall not be deprived of reservation benefits if he decides to “reconvert” to Hinduism and adopts the caste that his forefathers originally belonged to just because he was born to Christian parents or has a Christian spouse. Expanding the scope of a previous Constitution benc...