Skip to main content

Equal right for compensation to mother,father of accident

The Madras High Court bench here today ruled that under Motor Accidents Claims Act, both mother and father of a spinster, who died in a road accident, had equal right to claim compensation.

Justice S Vimala on a compensation case filed by Sivappan, father of Kaliammal who died in an accident, said "the mother of the woman has as much right as the father of the woman in claiming the compensation".

The mother S Parasakthi also could include herself as one of the claimants before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Judge said.

Parasakthi was added as a claimant along with other legal heirs only after the death of Sivbappan. "Even at the time when the petition was filed claiming compensation, unfortunately, the mother, though alive, had not been added as a legal heir of the deceased", the judge said.

Only after the death of Sivappan, Parasakthi had been brought on record as legal heir of her deceased husband.

The mother of the deceased ought to have been on record already in the capacity as legal heir. Therefore, the major amount of compensation had to be paid only to Parasakthi, the judge said.

The judge pointed out that the accident had occurred when the victim was travelling in a trailer attached to a tractor. The driver admitted his negligence and hence a tribunal in Sankarankovil had on April 31, 2002 directed the insurance company to pay a compensation of Rs 2.92 lakh.

The Judge agreed with the insurance company that it was not liable for the driver's mistake of having allowed the woman labourer to travel in the trailer. However, the insurance company should pay the compensation first and then recover it from the tractor owner, the judge said.

The Judge said the tribunal had also wrongly calculated compensation amount by taking the age of the deceased and not that of the claimants under consideration and reduced the amount from Rs.2.92 lakh to Rs.1.84 lakh. Major portion of this should be given to the mother, the judge said.

Article referred: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/equal-right-for-compensation-to-mother-father-of-accident-114102500538_1.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Appellate authorities under Special Statutes cannot be asked to condone delay

Madras High Court in R.Gowrishankar vs. The Commissioner of Service Tax has held that Appellate authorities cannot be asked to condone the delay, beyond the extended period of limitation A Division Bench comprising of Justices S. Manikumar and D. Krishnakumar, made this observation while considering an appeal filed against Single Bench order declining to set aside the order made in the condone delay petition filed by the petitioner to condone 223 days in filing the appeal before the Commissioner of Service Tax (Appeals). Article referred: http://www.livelaw.in/appellate-authorities-special-statutes-cannot-asked-condone-delay-beyond-extended-period-limitation-madras-hc/
Post a Comment
Read more

'Seize assets to pay damages to accident victim'

Her story might be an inspiration for the physically challenged but justice has remained elusive for her. In 2008, a bus accident left research engineer S Thenmozhi, 30, paraplegic. In April 2013, the motor accident claims tribunal directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (TNSTC) to provide her a compensation of 57.9 lakh. However, TNSTC refused to budge and on Tuesday a city court ordered attaching of movable assets of the transport corporation. Thenmozhi was employed in C-DOT, a telecom technology development centre in Bangalore. On July 21, 2008, she was coming to Chennai in a private bus. Around 2am, the bus had a flat tyre and the driver parked it on the left side of the road near Pallikonda in Vellore district on the Bangalore-Chennai highway. While the tyre was being changed, a TNSTC bus of Dharmapuri division hit the stationary bus. The rear part of the bus was smashed and passengers were injured. Thenmozhi who had a seat at the back of the bus suffered...
Post a Comment
Read more

Mumbai ITAT rules income of offshore discretionary trust is subject to tax in India

The Mumbai Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently determined the following issue in the affirmative in the case of Manoj Dhupelia: Should the income of an offshore discretionary trust be subject to tax in India, if no distributions have been made to beneficiaries in India? The question arose from appeals filed by individual beneficiaries in relation to a Lichtenstein-based trust, the Ambrunova Trust and Merlyn Management SA (the Trust) with the ITAT. It is important to note that the individuals in this case were amongst those first identified by the Government of India (GOI) as holding undeclared bank accounts in Lichtenstein. The ITAT ruling raises the following issues: Taxation of Trust Corpus: ITAT classified the corpus of the trust as "undisclosed income" and declared it taxable in the hands of the beneficiaries. Taxation of Undistributed Income: ITAT refused to draw a distinction between the corpus and undistributed income from the trust and declared i...
Post a Comment
Read more