Skip to main content

Equal right for compensation to mother,father of accident

The Madras High Court bench here today ruled that under Motor Accidents Claims Act, both mother and father of a spinster, who died in a road accident, had equal right to claim compensation.

Justice S Vimala on a compensation case filed by Sivappan, father of Kaliammal who died in an accident, said "the mother of the woman has as much right as the father of the woman in claiming the compensation".

The mother S Parasakthi also could include herself as one of the claimants before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, the Judge said.

Parasakthi was added as a claimant along with other legal heirs only after the death of Sivbappan. "Even at the time when the petition was filed claiming compensation, unfortunately, the mother, though alive, had not been added as a legal heir of the deceased", the judge said.

Only after the death of Sivappan, Parasakthi had been brought on record as legal heir of her deceased husband.

The mother of the deceased ought to have been on record already in the capacity as legal heir. Therefore, the major amount of compensation had to be paid only to Parasakthi, the judge said.

The judge pointed out that the accident had occurred when the victim was travelling in a trailer attached to a tractor. The driver admitted his negligence and hence a tribunal in Sankarankovil had on April 31, 2002 directed the insurance company to pay a compensation of Rs 2.92 lakh.

The Judge agreed with the insurance company that it was not liable for the driver's mistake of having allowed the woman labourer to travel in the trailer. However, the insurance company should pay the compensation first and then recover it from the tractor owner, the judge said.

The Judge said the tribunal had also wrongly calculated compensation amount by taking the age of the deceased and not that of the claimants under consideration and reduced the amount from Rs.2.92 lakh to Rs.1.84 lakh. Major portion of this should be given to the mother, the judge said.

Article referred: http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/equal-right-for-compensation-to-mother-father-of-accident-114102500538_1.html

Comments

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

Mere Agreement To Sell The Leased Property To Tenant Would Not Terminate Landlord-Tenant Relationship

In CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 1237­1238 OF 2019, Dr. H.K. Sharma vs Shri Ram Lal, the tenant had objected against the eviction suit filed by the landlord, claiming that the landlord-tenant relationship between them had ceased to exist by virtue of an agreement for sale entered between them and that he has already paid some money in advance based on the agreement. The tenant contented as the landlord-tenant relationship did not exist, the landlord cannot evict him. The matter went through various forums and finally landed before the Supreme Court in appeal. The Supreme Court referring to the judgment in Shah Mathuradas Maganlal & Co. vs. Nagappa Shankarappa Malage & Ors., held that in the instant case the lease agreement included no clauses on the fate of the tenancy. A fortiori, the parties did not intend to surrender the tenancy rights despite entering into an agreement of sale of the tenanted property. In other words, if the parties really intended to surrender their tenancy ...

Valuation Report of Jewellery once made is effective for Four Assessment Years

The division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Pr.Commissioner of Wealth Tax vs. Raghu Hari Dalmia held that a valuation report made by a registered valuer once adopted shall be in effect for four assessment years unless an event has occurred whereby the value is increased or decreased. The High Court made it clear that the event of “search” under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot compel the assessee to undertake a fresh valuation.