Skip to main content

‘Delightful’ word may be sexually coloured, says SC

"Every day is a matter of learning," said the Supreme Court realizing and learning from a male advocate's remark that he found it 'delightful' to be repeatedly interrupted during his arguments by a woman lawyer.

This realization dawned on the court during the hearing of a petition filed by a former Gwalior additional district Judge, who had challenged the in-house inquiry committee set by the Madhya Pradesh high court Chief Justice to probe
her sexual harassment complaint against a sitting HC Judge.

The sequence of events unfolded like this. When the counsel for the HC was advancing his arguments, the counsel for the petitioner interjected repeatedly to express her views.

When the bench told the HC counsel to go on with his arguments unmindful of the repeated interjections, the counsel in a lighter vein remarked: "The interjections by the senior counsel for the petitioner are always delightful." 

The petitioner's counsel immediately took serious objection to the term 'delightful" used with reference to her. She questioned the use of the term by asking the HC counsel whether similar interjections by men were also considered by him as 'delightful'. If not, then why her interjections were found delightful, she asked and went on to describe the HC counsel's observations as 'sexually coloured'. 

The bench considered the lighter vein comment and the serious objections raised against it by the petitioner's counsel and came to the conclusion that "she may well be right". 

"There is a lot to learn from what she innocuously conveyed. Her sensitivity to the issue, one may confess, brought out to us, a wholly different understanding of the subject. It is, therefore, that we have remarked above, that the evaluation of a charge of sexual harassment would depend on the manner in which it is perceived," said a bench of Justices J S Khehar and Arun Mishra. 

"Each case will have to be decided on its own merits. Whether the perception of the harassed individual was conveyed to the person accused would be very material in a case falling in the realm of over-sensitivity," the bench said. 

"In that, it would not be open to him thereafter, to defend himself by projecting that he had not sexually harassed the person concerned, because his understanding of the alleged action was unoffending," the bench warned. 

Justice Khehar, writing the judgment for the bench, said: "The issue of sexual harassment has a variety of fine connotations. Its evaluation may sometimes depend upon the sensitivity of the person concerned. And also whether, the perception of the harassed individual was known to the one against whom the accusing finger is pointed."

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Delightful-word-may-be-sexually-coloured-says-SC/articleshow/45568351.cms

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

One Sided Clauses In Builder-Buyer Agreements Is An Unfair Trade Practice

In CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12238 OF 2018, Pioneer Urban Land & Infrastructure Ltd. vs Govindan Raghavan, an appeal was filed before the Supreme Court  by the builder against the order of the National Consumer Forum. The builder had relied upon various clauses of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement to refute the claim of the respondent but was rejected by the commission which found the said clauses as wholly one-sided, unfair and unreasonable, and could not be relied upon. The Supreme Court on perusal of the Apartment Buyer’s Agreement found stark incongruities between the remedies available to both the parties. For example, Clause 6.4 (ii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to charge Interest @18% p.a. on account of any delay in payment of installments from the Respondent – Flat Purchaser. Clause 6.4 (iii) of the Agreement entitles the Appellant – Builder to cancel the allotment and terminate the Agreement, if any installment remains in arrears for more than 30 da...
Post a Comment
Read more

Inherited property of childless hindu woman devolve onto heirs of her parents

In Tarabai Dagdu Nitanware vs Narayan Keru Nitanware, quashing an order passed by a joint civil judge junior division, Pune, the Bombay High Court has held that under Section 15 of the Hindu Succession Act, any property inherited by a female Hindu from her father or mother, will devolve upon the heirs of her father/mother, if she dies without any children of her own, and not upon her husband. Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing a writ petition filed by relatives of one Sundarabai, who died issueless more than 45 years ago on June 18, 1962. Article referred:http://www.livelaw.in/property-inherited-female-hindu-parents-shall-devolve-upon-heirs-father-not-husband-dies-childless-bombay-hc-read-judgment/
Post a Comment
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more