Skip to main content

‘Delightful’ word may be sexually coloured, says SC

"Every day is a matter of learning," said the Supreme Court realizing and learning from a male advocate's remark that he found it 'delightful' to be repeatedly interrupted during his arguments by a woman lawyer.

This realization dawned on the court during the hearing of a petition filed by a former Gwalior additional district Judge, who had challenged the in-house inquiry committee set by the Madhya Pradesh high court Chief Justice to probe
her sexual harassment complaint against a sitting HC Judge.

The sequence of events unfolded like this. When the counsel for the HC was advancing his arguments, the counsel for the petitioner interjected repeatedly to express her views.

When the bench told the HC counsel to go on with his arguments unmindful of the repeated interjections, the counsel in a lighter vein remarked: "The interjections by the senior counsel for the petitioner are always delightful." 

The petitioner's counsel immediately took serious objection to the term 'delightful" used with reference to her. She questioned the use of the term by asking the HC counsel whether similar interjections by men were also considered by him as 'delightful'. If not, then why her interjections were found delightful, she asked and went on to describe the HC counsel's observations as 'sexually coloured'. 

The bench considered the lighter vein comment and the serious objections raised against it by the petitioner's counsel and came to the conclusion that "she may well be right". 

"There is a lot to learn from what she innocuously conveyed. Her sensitivity to the issue, one may confess, brought out to us, a wholly different understanding of the subject. It is, therefore, that we have remarked above, that the evaluation of a charge of sexual harassment would depend on the manner in which it is perceived," said a bench of Justices J S Khehar and Arun Mishra. 

"Each case will have to be decided on its own merits. Whether the perception of the harassed individual was conveyed to the person accused would be very material in a case falling in the realm of over-sensitivity," the bench said. 

"In that, it would not be open to him thereafter, to defend himself by projecting that he had not sexually harassed the person concerned, because his understanding of the alleged action was unoffending," the bench warned. 

Justice Khehar, writing the judgment for the bench, said: "The issue of sexual harassment has a variety of fine connotations. Its evaluation may sometimes depend upon the sensitivity of the person concerned. And also whether, the perception of the harassed individual was known to the one against whom the accusing finger is pointed."

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Delightful-word-may-be-sexually-coloured-says-SC/articleshow/45568351.cms

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more

Procedure to be followed on admissibility of additional evidence at appeal stage

In The Corporation of Madras vs M. Parthasarathy & Ors., the trial court had allowed the respondent company to file evidence in the form of photocopies and had dismissed all the four suits filed by the respondents with costs as the evidence were in the form of photocopies and were objected to by the respondents. On appeal the Additional District Judge allowed the respondents to file additional evidence in the form the original documents of the earlier admitted photocopies and based on the same allowed the appeal. In its turn the High Court also dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants who in turn approached the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided that the first Appellate Court committed two jurisdictional errors in allowing the appeals.  Referring to earlier judgements of the Supreme Court in Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board vs. H. Narayanaiah & Ors., , Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. vs. Surendra Oil & Dal Mills (Refineri...
Post a Comment
Read more