Skip to main content

Madras high court bans arbitrary police raids on massage parlours, spas

Massage parlours, spas, therapeutic treatment, beauty parlours, wellness centres, unisex salons and health clubs - call them by any name, but police and other authorities cannot interfere in their functioning without first making a law either to permit or regulate such entities, the Madras high court ruled on Wednesday. 

Justice V Ramasubramanian, coming to the rescue of a batch of petitions from those who promote this business in Chennai, said: "It is quite unfortunate that the very word 'massage' has come to be looked down upon due to the abuse of these centres by a few individuals. Therefore, it may be necessary for the government to regulate, by law, the industry and provide certain basic parameters." 

He then said the authorities shall not, as a matter of routine and without any basis, conduct any raids and interfere with the business carried on by the petitioners. 

He passed the orders after massage parlour and spa owners complained that they were being subjected to raids, on a regular basis, by officials of the Anti-Vice Squad (AVS) of the Chennai police. 

Claiming that such raids and the frequent interference by the police not only spoiled their business, but also projected them in poor light and that it also amounted to an interference with their fundamental right to carry on a lawful business, they moved the court for relief. 

They all heavily relied on Justice K Chandru's July 2009 judgment that majoritarian impulses rooted in moralistic tradition could not impinge upon individual autonomy. However, He had added a word of caution that there was no prohibition for police to inspect and take appropriate action in cases of criminal activities. 

On Wednesday, pointing out that police neither had a specific law to act upon or acted according to the provisions laid down in the available law, Justice Ramasubramanian held that they could invoke provisions of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act in specific cases and complaints by following all the mandatory steps mentioned in the law. 

According to the Act, a special police officer or a trafficking police officer can enter upon any premises and cause a search without warrant, only if he had reasonable grounds for believing that an offence punishable under the Act was being committed. He must believe that the search of the premises with warrant cannot be made without undue delay and that he must record the grounds of his belief before entering the premises. He should also be accompanied by neutral witnesses. 

Narrating the legislative measures specifically addressing all possible contours of the wellness and massage business in places like Thailand, Singapore, various states in America and the Philippines, Justice Ramasubramanian said: "India itself has a potential to develop this industry in view of the availability of experts in the field of yoga, naturopathy, ayurveda, siddha and varma, who are well trained to provide health care services." 

If, as in the case of other countries, qualifications are prescribed for persons engaged to render services in these centres, this industry may develop as one that complements alternative systems of indigenous medicine, he said. 

"If health clubs, massage centres and spas are properly regulated and if qualifications are fixed for persons employed therein to render services, they would provide enormous employment opportunities to students coming out of colleges teaching alternative, indigenous systems of medicine," Justice Ramasubramanian said. 

"This will also remove the kind of stigma now sought to be attached to these centres. As a matter of fact, specialists in the art and science of varma, which is now slowly getting extinct (with probably a few individuals still left in places like Kanyakumari), can do wonders in massage centers. Therefore, regulating the industry of health clubs, massage centres and spas and prescribing qualifications for persons employed therein, would make the industry, a place for the highly skilled and professionalized one," he said. 

As a solution, he said the Chennai Corporation could invoke its rule-making powers and include the wellness business specifying the activities for which business licences are applied for and issued. 

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/chennai/Madras-high-court-bans-arbitrary-police-raids-on-massage-parlours-spas/articleshow/45546604.cms

Comments

Most viewed this month

Merits and the terms of contract are irrelevant for invoking of the bank guarantees

In Sabarkantha Annuity Pvt. Ltd. Vs. NHAI and Ors, the Petitioner filed before the Delhi High Court  petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015 with a prayer that, Respondents be restrained from acting upon the letter dated 15th September, 2017 or from invoking the Bid securities of the Petitioner to the tune of Rs. 10.93 Crores and also restraining the banks from honouring the invocation of said bank guarantees on behalf of Respondent No. 1 acting in terms of letter dated 3rd November, 2007. Petitioner has relied upon Clauses Nos. 9.1.1, 9.1.2 and 4.3 of the agreement dated 28th April, 2017 entered into between the parties to say the claim for damages since is not a claim for a sum presently due and payable and the respondent would be entitled to damages only on proof of loss, per Clause 4.3 of the agreement and hence is not entitle to the entire sum of bid security.  The Court found that Clause No. 9.1.2 speaks of an exclusiv...

Right of pre-emption under West Bengal Land Reform Act

In Rabindra Nath Kundu & Anr vs Sudhir Hira, Bijoy Krishna Hira being the owner in the suit plot, gifted to Santosh Kumar Hira demarcated 11 decimals of land vide deed of gift dated 27.4.2004 and the latter sold 9 decimals out of 11 decimals of land to Sudhir Hira the preemptor/opposite party no. 1 and well demarcated 1.65 decimals of land in the said plot along with several other plots were sold, transferred and conveyed to the preemptees/petitioners herein by a registered deed of sale dated 10.8.2010, the subject matter of preemption. It is argued on behalf of the preemptees that  the present opposite party no. 1/preemptor Sudhir Hira has no relationship of co-sharership with Santosh Kumar Hira opposite party no. 2 as the demarcated portion of land has been purchased. It is settled principle of law that partial preemption is not permissible and this was what the view adopted by this Hon'ble High Court is Surendra Vs. Abhimannu reported in (1980) 1 Cal LJ 135 whe...

CBI has no jurisdiction to probe affairs of medical college:HC

The Madras High Court has quashed charges against administrators of a medical college and dismissed CBI's petitions opposing discharge of officials of two other medical colleges, saying the investigation agency, or any other external agency for that matter, has no jurisdiction to probe the affairs of a medical college. Quashing the charges against the administrators of a medical college and dismissing CBI's petitions opposing the discharge of officials of two other medical colleges, Justice Aruna Jagadeesan said "contravention of rules and regulations may be an offence against the statute but is not a crime. There is no room or jurisdiction for any external agency to investigate the affairs of any medical institution coming within the purview of the Medical Council of India." In identical set of orders, all delivered on August 6, Justice Jagadeesan said "the shortfall in faculties and submissions of fake/forged documents would only disentitle the institution...