The Supreme Court has said that the recent ordinance on land acquisition is prospective in nature, holding that delays owing to litigation are to be counted to the benefit of landowners and going against state governments owing to the absence of specific language to this effect.
The court also said the benefit given to landowners is a "statutory right" and "cannot be taken away by an ordinance by inserting proviso to the above-said sub-section without giving it retrospective effect", it said with reference to the relevant clause.
"We are... of the view that there is a presumption against the retrospective operation of a statute and further a statute is not to be construed to have a greater retrospective operation than its language renders necessary, but an amending Act which affects the procedure is presumed to be retrospective, unless amending Act provides otherwise," it said.
The ruling was passed earlier this week on a petition filed by M/s Radiance Fincap Pvt. Ltd against the central government on the acquisition of its land. The company filed an application to challenge the ordinance that was promulgated recently.
The ordinance had been issued after widespread criticism that the land acquisition law that came into force on January 1, 2014, was flawed. It had brought land acquisitions to a halt, thus preventing development projects from getting off the ground.
Amending this was one of the key aims of the Narendra Modi government as part of its agenda to boost investment and economic activity in order to upgrade India's creaky infrastructure, generate jobs and revive growth.
While the relaxations in the ordinance applied mainly to the consent of land holders in relation to projects being set up in various industries, it covered other areas as well, including court delays.
Since the Act wasn't clear on the matter, the former UPA government solicitor general had issued a clarification at the end of January 2014 that any delay caused by the courts will benefit landowners.
The state governments had sought a review but the Supreme Court upheld this view, relying on a "plain reading" of the legislation.
The ordinance had said court delays will be excluded, which was seen as favouring state governments and going against landowners in cases involving thousands of crores of rupees.
The Supreme Court said earlier this week that "the legal position that emerges is that when a repeal of an enactment is followed by a fresh legislation, such legislation does not affect the substantive rights of the parties on the date of suit or adjudication of suit unless such a legislation is retrospective".
Article referred: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/land-ordinance-is-prospective-owners-can-take-benefit-of-delays-supreme-court/articleshow/45935617.cms
The court also said the benefit given to landowners is a "statutory right" and "cannot be taken away by an ordinance by inserting proviso to the above-said sub-section without giving it retrospective effect", it said with reference to the relevant clause.
"We are... of the view that there is a presumption against the retrospective operation of a statute and further a statute is not to be construed to have a greater retrospective operation than its language renders necessary, but an amending Act which affects the procedure is presumed to be retrospective, unless amending Act provides otherwise," it said.
The ruling was passed earlier this week on a petition filed by M/s Radiance Fincap Pvt. Ltd against the central government on the acquisition of its land. The company filed an application to challenge the ordinance that was promulgated recently.
The ordinance had been issued after widespread criticism that the land acquisition law that came into force on January 1, 2014, was flawed. It had brought land acquisitions to a halt, thus preventing development projects from getting off the ground.
Amending this was one of the key aims of the Narendra Modi government as part of its agenda to boost investment and economic activity in order to upgrade India's creaky infrastructure, generate jobs and revive growth.
While the relaxations in the ordinance applied mainly to the consent of land holders in relation to projects being set up in various industries, it covered other areas as well, including court delays.
Since the Act wasn't clear on the matter, the former UPA government solicitor general had issued a clarification at the end of January 2014 that any delay caused by the courts will benefit landowners.
The state governments had sought a review but the Supreme Court upheld this view, relying on a "plain reading" of the legislation.
The ordinance had said court delays will be excluded, which was seen as favouring state governments and going against landowners in cases involving thousands of crores of rupees.
The Supreme Court said earlier this week that "the legal position that emerges is that when a repeal of an enactment is followed by a fresh legislation, such legislation does not affect the substantive rights of the parties on the date of suit or adjudication of suit unless such a legislation is retrospective".
Article referred: http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/land-ordinance-is-prospective-owners-can-take-benefit-of-delays-supreme-court/articleshow/45935617.cms
Comments
Post a Comment