Skip to main content

Madras High Court fixes notional salary of homemaker at Rs. 3500

How much should a homemaker be paid? Or can we even measure her worth?

A division bench of the Madras High Court, comprising Justice Prabha Sridevan and Justice T.S. Sivagnanam, has declared: ‘The time has come to scientifically assess the value of the unpaid homemaker, both in accident claims and in division of matrimonial property’.

The case: Compensation was claimed for a couple killed in an accident. What was the woman worth? The judges said: “One cannot ignore... that the homemaker, by applying herself to the tasks at home, liberates her spouse to devote his energy, time and attention to… generate property for the family”. Fixing the notional income of the woman at Rs. 3,500, they awarded Rs. 7.6 lakh to her daughter. “Homemakers too should be considered earning members,” they said.

How do you put a number to what a homemaker does? The judges suggested (a) what she would have earned had she not remained at home, (b) if marriage is an equal economic partnership, the homemaker’s salary is half her husband’s, (c) how much it would cost to replace the homemaker with paid workers. The Motor Vehicles Act puts it at a third of what a spouse gets. Ha! Planning to submit a bill to the spouse? Even if it is a modest one, be careful to hand it over with an anti-shock pill.

There’s no formula to calculate the homemakers’ value / contribution. The Supreme Court in 2001 fixed Rs. 3,000 as the notional income of homemakers.


Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more

No Rebate For Stamp Duty Paid In Another State - Bombay HC

A three judge bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court (Bombay HC) in a recent judgment in the matter of Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune and Superintendent of Stamp (Headquarters), Mumbai v Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai and Reliance Petroleum Limited, Gujarat1 has held that orders in case of a scheme of arrangement under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) involving different High Courts in multiple states, are separate instruments in themselves. Accordingly, stamp duty would be payable on all the orders (and consequently, all the states) without the benefit of remission, rebate or set-off.
Post a Comment
Read more