A driving licence that stood expired on the date of a traffic accident cannot be considered to be legally valid unless it is renewed within the statutory period of 30 days, the Kerala high court has held. If the licence is not renewed so, the insurance company won't be liable to pay compensation, the court said.
A five-member bench led by acting Chief Justice Ashok Bhushan on Wednesday overruled a 2004 decision by a three-member bench on the issue. The three-member bench had held that driving licence would continue to exist in spite of its expiry unless the licensee is disqualified from holding a licence.
The 2004 decision does not lay down the correct law and, therefore, it is overruled, the judgment authored by Justice A V Ramakrishna Pillai for the full bench said.
In addition to Justice Bhushan and Justice Pillai, the full bench comprised Justice A M Shaffique, Justice A Hariprasad, and Justice A K Jayasankaran Nambiar.
The five-member bench held, "It is beyond dispute that the licence would stand renewed automatically only if the application for renewal is filed within a period of 30 days from the date of expiry thereof. In such cases, even if an accident takes place within the aforementioned period, the driver may be held to be possessing a valid driving licence. The proviso to sub-section (1) of section 15 (of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988) makes it clear that the driving licence shall be renewed with effect only from the date of renewal, in the event of an application for renewal of licence being made more than 30 days after the date of expiry. That means, on the renewal of licence on such terms, the driver of the vehicle cannot be said to have been holding a valid driving licence from the date of expiry till the date of renewal."
The court was considering an appeal filed by Oriental Insurance Company through advocate Mathews Jacob.
The company challenged an order by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal of Irinjalakuda in 1996 asking it to pay Rs1.36 lakh to Poulose Ouseph for injuries suffered when he was hit by a lorry at Nalukettu public road at Koratty around 11.45am on March 7, 1996.
Insurance company contended before the high court that the licence of the lorry driver had expired prior to date of the accident and, therefore, they are not liable to pay compensation.
As the insurance company had already paid the compensation, the high court allowed the company to recover the amount paid from the owner of the vehicle.
Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/No-claim-if-licence-not-renewed-in-time/articleshow/45976827.cms
A five-member bench led by acting Chief Justice Ashok Bhushan on Wednesday overruled a 2004 decision by a three-member bench on the issue. The three-member bench had held that driving licence would continue to exist in spite of its expiry unless the licensee is disqualified from holding a licence.
The 2004 decision does not lay down the correct law and, therefore, it is overruled, the judgment authored by Justice A V Ramakrishna Pillai for the full bench said.
In addition to Justice Bhushan and Justice Pillai, the full bench comprised Justice A M Shaffique, Justice A Hariprasad, and Justice A K Jayasankaran Nambiar.
The five-member bench held, "It is beyond dispute that the licence would stand renewed automatically only if the application for renewal is filed within a period of 30 days from the date of expiry thereof. In such cases, even if an accident takes place within the aforementioned period, the driver may be held to be possessing a valid driving licence. The proviso to sub-section (1) of section 15 (of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988) makes it clear that the driving licence shall be renewed with effect only from the date of renewal, in the event of an application for renewal of licence being made more than 30 days after the date of expiry. That means, on the renewal of licence on such terms, the driver of the vehicle cannot be said to have been holding a valid driving licence from the date of expiry till the date of renewal."
The court was considering an appeal filed by Oriental Insurance Company through advocate Mathews Jacob.
The company challenged an order by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal of Irinjalakuda in 1996 asking it to pay Rs1.36 lakh to Poulose Ouseph for injuries suffered when he was hit by a lorry at Nalukettu public road at Koratty around 11.45am on March 7, 1996.
Insurance company contended before the high court that the licence of the lorry driver had expired prior to date of the accident and, therefore, they are not liable to pay compensation.
As the insurance company had already paid the compensation, the high court allowed the company to recover the amount paid from the owner of the vehicle.
Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kochi/No-claim-if-licence-not-renewed-in-time/articleshow/45976827.cms
Comments
Post a Comment