Skip to main content

Don’t always rely blindly on rape survivor’s testimony, says SC

Testimony of an alleged rape survivor stands on a higher pedestal but courts should not blindly rely upon such statements, the Supreme Court has ruled.

A bench of Justices Dipak Misra and N V Ramana said courts should try to find out direct or circumstantial evidence for conviction in rape cases if testimony of the survivor was not reliable and in such cases medical evidence should be taken into account.

"The grammar of law permits that the testimony of a prosecutrix can be accepted without any corroboration without material particulars, for she has to be placed on a higher pedestal, but when a court, on studied scrutiny of the evidence, finds it difficult to accept the version of the prosecutrix because it is not unreproachable, there is requirement for search of such direct or circumstantial evidence which would lend assurance to her testimony," the court said.

The court acquitted a man of rape and kidnapping charges after coming to the conclusion that the testimony of the prosecutrix was not reliable. The trial court and the Delhi high court had convicted the accused, Mohamad Ali, and awarded him a ten-year jail term.

It noted that a person can be convicted on the basis of sole testimony of a rape survivor if her statement was unimpeachable and beyond reproach.

"In the case at hand, the learned trial judge as well as the high court have persuaded themselves away with this principle without appreciating the acceptability and reliability of the testimony of the witness. In fact, it would not be inappropriate to say that whatever the analysis in the impugned judgment, it would only indicate an impropriety of approach," the court said.

The court acquitted Ali after considering the survivor's medical report. The report said there were no injuries on her private parts.

"As the present case would show, her testimony does not inspire confidence, and the circumstantial evidence remotely does not lend any support to the same. In the absence of both, we are compelled to hold that the learned trial judge has erroneously convicted the accused-appellant for the alleged offences and the high court has fallen into error, without re-appreciating the material on record, by giving the stamp of approval to the same," it said.

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Dont-always-rely-blindly-on-rape-survivors-testimony-says-SC/articleshow/46522662.cms

Comments

Most viewed this month

Partition proceedings are vitiated even if single co-sharer is not made party or is not served in accordance with law

Cause Title :  Bhagwant Singh vs  Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab, Chandigarh,  CWP-2132-2018 (O&M), High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh Date of Judgment/Order : 31.08.2022 Corum : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal Background A large parcel of land was owned by the Nagar Panchayat. Thereafter, some of the co-sharers sold their shares to third parties including the petitioners herein. On 22.11.1995, respondents No.3 to 5 filed an application for partition of the land. The petitioners were not impleaded as parties.  On completion of proceedings, sanad was issued on 28.08.1996. Vide two separate sale deeds dated 28.05.2008 respondents No.3 and 5 sold some portion in favour of respondent No.6 and 7. These respondents sought implementation of the sanad resulting in issuance of warrants of possession dated 05.06.2008. Allegedly, it was then that the petitioners realized that joint land had been partitioned and that proceedings h...

Power of Attorney holder can also file cheque bounce cases: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a criminal complaint in a cheque bounce case can be filed and pursued by a person who holds a power of attorney (PoA) on behalf of the complainant. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam gave the "authoritative" pronouncement on the issue, referred to it by a division bench in view of conflicting judgements of some high courts and the apex court. "We are of the view that the power of attorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which deals with cheque bounce cases)," the bench, also comprising justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Ranjan Gogoi, said. The bench, in its judgement, said, "...we clarify the position and answer the questions in the following manner: "Filing of complaint petition under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act through PoA holder is perfectly legal...

Christian who reconverts as Hindu SC will get quota benefits

Amid the controversy over “ghar wapsi”, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person who “reconverts” from Christianity to Hinduism shall be entitled to reservation benefits if his forefathers belonged to a Scheduled Caste and the community accepts him after “reconversion”. Citing articles by B R Ambedkar and James Massey, and reports by Mandal Commission and Chinappa Commission, the court said: “There has been detailed study to indicate the Scheduled Caste persons belonging to Hindu religion, who had embraced Christianity with some kind of hope or aspiration, have remained socially, educationally and economically backward.” The bench of Justices Dipak Misra and V Gopala Gowda held that a person shall not be deprived of reservation benefits if he decides to “reconvert” to Hinduism and adopts the caste that his forefathers originally belonged to just because he was born to Christian parents or has a Christian spouse. Expanding the scope of a previous Constitution benc...