Skip to main content

Law student wins case against courier company

Chanakya Sharma, (21), a student of National Law University in Lucknow,  contested for a year against an errant courier company in the consumer court in Ahmedabad and won on July 1.

This case has set two precedents the court adjudged that the courier company's liability printed on its receipt, which says that in case of any loss or damage the company shall not pay more than Rs 100, is against the public policy and ordered the company to pay a compensation of Rs 7, 000. Secondly, court admitted the case in Ahmedabad, where cause of action arose rather than the prevalent norm of accepting a case at the place of contract. The place of contract in this case was Jaipur.

Sharma, a resident of Jaipur hired the services of Overnite Express Ltd in Jaipur to send his project report titled Critical thinking and legal reasoning' on a condition of dropping it in the Nirma University, Ahmedabad on March 7, 2014. However, his project reached 7 days later causing him the loss of 15 marks on his project work.

"During the seven days, I called the courier service in Jaipur and Ahmedabad for 4-5 times a day but they didn't give me the exact status of my academic papers," said Sharma, who is presently doing his internship with State Commission for Consumer Dispute Redressal, Jaipur.

Finally, he filed a case at the consumer redressal forum in Ahmedabad intending to test consumers rights enshrined in the law. He filed a token compensation of Rs 10,000 only to cover up the expenses of his litigation.

He demolished the courier company's main argument which said that Ahmedabad court do not have jurisdiction to hear this case. "Though it was Jaipur where contract was signed but it was Ahmedabad where the cause of action arose," argued by the Sharma. He also presented case laws stating that private entities cannot impose upon ordinary citizens its conditions which are opposed to the public policy.

"I truly believe that there is an urgent need of spreading awareness about consumer rights. And after the long battle of more than a year, I believe that we can create a society where even an average consumer who is away from litigation acrobatics can get justice by the judicial mechanism present in the country," said Sharma.

Article referred: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/City/Jaipur/Law-student-wins-case-against-courier-company/articleshow/48046925.cms

Comments

Most viewed this month

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...

No Rebate For Stamp Duty Paid In Another State - Bombay HC

A three judge bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court (Bombay HC) in a recent judgment in the matter of Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune and Superintendent of Stamp (Headquarters), Mumbai v Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai and Reliance Petroleum Limited, Gujarat1 has held that orders in case of a scheme of arrangement under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) involving different High Courts in multiple states, are separate instruments in themselves. Accordingly, stamp duty would be payable on all the orders (and consequently, all the states) without the benefit of remission, rebate or set-off.