In a recent judgment in SURINDER SINGH vs PIARA SINGH, while deciding on various issues related to a disputed will, the Hon'ble court held that :-
1) When attesting witnesses not found that, it becomes incumbent upon the propounder of the Will to prove two facts (i) that the attestation of one attesting witness atleast was in his handwriting; and (ii) that the signatures of the executant is in his handwriting.
2) A Will is not a document which can be admitted in evidence without complying with the provisions specifically stipulated for proving the same.
1) When attesting witnesses not found that, it becomes incumbent upon the propounder of the Will to prove two facts (i) that the attestation of one attesting witness atleast was in his handwriting; and (ii) that the signatures of the executant is in his handwriting.
2) A Will is not a document which can be admitted in evidence without complying with the provisions specifically stipulated for proving the same.
Comments
Post a Comment