Skip to main content

Insurance - rule of contra proferentem & Ambiguity in language

In United India Insurance Co. Ltd. VS M/s Orient Treasures Pvt. Ltd.,the respondent company while appealing against the claim allowed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission as being too low. The issue was that respondent company’s claim after being burgled was rejected by the insurance company as according to the insurer the burglary took place in the night when the jewellery was kept in window display neither of which was covered by the policy.

Among the interesting aspect of this matter is that both the litigants referred to the same court decisions claiming that the said judgments support their cause. (This is a prefect example of the denseness of the legalese. It has been said that the language used in India is more archaic than that used in England). In any case the respondent company tried to invoke the “contra proferentem” rule claiming ambiguity in the language of the policy. The insurer said there is no ambiguity and that the respondent never raised this issue with the insurer or asked for any explanation till the burglary.

The relevant clauses of the policy stated :-

Clause 4) Window display at night is not covered.
Clause 5) We do  not cover stocks kept out of the safe---business hours at night.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court, referring to the judgment of the Constitution Bench of this Court in General Assurance Society Ltd. vs. Chandumull Jain & Anr., AIR 1966 SC 1644, explained that :-

1) A contract of insurance is a species of commercial transactions
2) Delay in issuing the policy makes no difference.
3) A contract is formed when there is an unqualified acceptance of the proposal. Acceptance may be expressed in writing or it may even be implied if the insurer accepts the premium and retains it.
4) In the case of the assured, a positive act on his part by which he recognises or seeks to enforce the policy amounts to an affirmation of it.
5) In interpreting documents relating to a contract of insurance, the duty of the court is to interpret the words in which the contract is expressed by the parties, because it is not for the court to make a new contract, however reasonable, if the parties have not made it themselves.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court while denying the appeal of the respondent stated that :-

1) As per clause 4, if the burglary had been committed during day time in business hours and in that burglary, the articles kept in display window were stolen then in such circumstances, the appellant was liable to reimburse the loss to the respondent of such stolen articles as insured articles under the policy but not if the burglary had been committed of the articles kept in display window during night time (after business hours).
2) As per clause 5, if the burglary had been committed during day time in business hours then the appellant was liable to reimburse the loss to the respondent of the stolen articles treating them as insured articles under the policy but not if the burglary had been committed of the stock/articles kept out of safe after business hours at night.

Comments

Most viewed this month

Partition proceedings are vitiated even if single co-sharer is not made party or is not served in accordance with law

Cause Title :  Bhagwant Singh vs  Financial Commissioner (Appeals) Punjab, Chandigarh,  CWP-2132-2018 (O&M), High Court Of Punjab & Haryana At Chandigarh Date of Judgment/Order : 31.08.2022 Corum : Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Mittal Background A large parcel of land was owned by the Nagar Panchayat. Thereafter, some of the co-sharers sold their shares to third parties including the petitioners herein. On 22.11.1995, respondents No.3 to 5 filed an application for partition of the land. The petitioners were not impleaded as parties.  On completion of proceedings, sanad was issued on 28.08.1996. Vide two separate sale deeds dated 28.05.2008 respondents No.3 and 5 sold some portion in favour of respondent No.6 and 7. These respondents sought implementation of the sanad resulting in issuance of warrants of possession dated 05.06.2008. Allegedly, it was then that the petitioners realized that joint land had been partitioned and that proceedings h...

Power of Attorney holder can also file cheque bounce cases: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that a criminal complaint in a cheque bounce case can be filed and pursued by a person who holds a power of attorney (PoA) on behalf of the complainant. A three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam gave the "authoritative" pronouncement on the issue, referred to it by a division bench in view of conflicting judgements of some high courts and the apex court. "We are of the view that the power of attorney holder may be allowed to file, appear and depose for the purpose of issue of process for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (which deals with cheque bounce cases)," the bench, also comprising justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Ranjan Gogoi, said. The bench, in its judgement, said, "...we clarify the position and answer the questions in the following manner: "Filing of complaint petition under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act through PoA holder is perfectly legal...

Christian who reconverts as Hindu SC will get quota benefits

Amid the controversy over “ghar wapsi”, the Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person who “reconverts” from Christianity to Hinduism shall be entitled to reservation benefits if his forefathers belonged to a Scheduled Caste and the community accepts him after “reconversion”. Citing articles by B R Ambedkar and James Massey, and reports by Mandal Commission and Chinappa Commission, the court said: “There has been detailed study to indicate the Scheduled Caste persons belonging to Hindu religion, who had embraced Christianity with some kind of hope or aspiration, have remained socially, educationally and economically backward.” The bench of Justices Dipak Misra and V Gopala Gowda held that a person shall not be deprived of reservation benefits if he decides to “reconvert” to Hinduism and adopts the caste that his forefathers originally belonged to just because he was born to Christian parents or has a Christian spouse. Expanding the scope of a previous Constitution benc...