The Madras High Court has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant attitude. Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed earlier of the court order.
Article referred: at: http://www.livelaw.in/litigants-must-stay-updated-case-status-cant-blame-lawyers-madras-hc/
Article referred: at: http://www.livelaw.in/litigants-must-stay-updated-case-status-cant-blame-lawyers-madras-hc/
The Madras High Court
has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and
said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with
case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant
attitude.
Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil
revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that
dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an
application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed
earlier of the court order.
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/litigants-must-stay-updated-case-status-cant-blame-lawyers-madras-hc/The Madras High Court has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant attitude. Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed earlier of the court order.The Madras High Court has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant attitude. Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed earlier of the court order.
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/litigants-must-stay-updated-case-status-cant-blame-lawyers-madras-hc/The Madras High Court has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant attitude. Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed earlier of the court order.The Madras High Court has pulled up litigants for negligence in follow-up of their case and said they cannot blame their lawyers for not keeping them abreast with case developments as they themselves need to adopt a more vigilant attitude. Justice MV Muralidaran took to the above stance while dismissing a civil revision petition by litigants that challenged a sub-court order that dismissed their plea for condoning the delay of 1,600 days in filing an application to set aside an ex-parte decree as they were not informed earlier of the court order.
Comments
Post a Comment