In Shahul Hameed Vs. P.E. Abdu Razak, the Hon'ble Kerala High Court held that -
1) When a tiny room only is required for the landlord, he need not forgo a monthly rent by occupying a spacious room.
2) A lazy trader cannot be considered to be a person solely or mainly depending for his livelihood on the income derived from his business.
3) In all cases tenants need not prove their precise income. But evidence must be produced to prove the approximate income.
4) If the tenant has only one source of income, he should prove that he is getting an income with which he can live. He cannot be heard to say that he need not produce any evidence to prove his income if he has only one source of income.
5) If the tenant has more sources of income than one, he should prove the approximate income from each source to prove that the income from the business or trade conducted in the tenanted premises is the main source of income for his livelihood.
1) When a tiny room only is required for the landlord, he need not forgo a monthly rent by occupying a spacious room.
2) A lazy trader cannot be considered to be a person solely or mainly depending for his livelihood on the income derived from his business.
3) In all cases tenants need not prove their precise income. But evidence must be produced to prove the approximate income.
4) If the tenant has only one source of income, he should prove that he is getting an income with which he can live. He cannot be heard to say that he need not produce any evidence to prove his income if he has only one source of income.
5) If the tenant has more sources of income than one, he should prove the approximate income from each source to prove that the income from the business or trade conducted in the tenanted premises is the main source of income for his livelihood.
Comments
Post a Comment