In Sagayam @ Devasagayam vs State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Chennai, in a significant judgment on bail jurisprudence, the Madras High Court has recently held that demanding production of property documents or RC book or any other document to show proof of property, either movable or immovable, with respect to the bail bond or surety bond amount, is against Article 21 of Constitution of India.
Justice P Devadass also held that the person, who is offering surety, must have acceptable residential proof.
Article referred:http://www.livelaw.in/even-beggar-can-stand-surety-acceptable-residential-proof-madras-hc-read-judgment/
Justice P Devadass also held that the person, who is offering surety, must have acceptable residential proof.
Article referred:http://www.livelaw.in/even-beggar-can-stand-surety-acceptable-residential-proof-madras-hc-read-judgment/
Comments
Post a Comment