Skip to main content

Oral or written dying declaration must pass test of reliability

Cause Title : Kamal Khudal v. State Of Assam, Criminal Appeal No. 470 Of 2015, Supreme Court Of India

Date of Judgment/Order : 14-07-2022

Corum : J.B. Pardiwala, J.

Citied: Heikrujam Chaoba Singh v. State of Manipur, (1999) 8 SCC 458

Background

The accused along with two others were convicted of murder based on a oral dying declaration along with some other circumstantial evidence namely :-

1) The convicted persons had accompanied the victim to a paddy field as per his relatives

2) All of them were seen by eye witnesses working in the field and then moving off to the liquor factory run by the accused

3) Key witness (PW-2) saw him stagger out of the shop and say he had been burnt.

The trial court found them guilty and passed judgment. The High Court also dismissed the appeal. Hence, matter was brought to the Supreme Court.

The accused objected to the  oral dying declaration of the deceased claiming it ought not to have been relied upon by the trial court as well as by the High Court as the same does not inspire any confidence. They argued that as a rule of prudence the courts below should have insisted for corroboration before relying upon an oral dying declaration which otherwise is a weak piece of evidence.

Judgment

The Supreme Court after looking into the medical record, mortem report, deposition of the medical examiner, witnesses and other evidences concluded that High Court was justified in accepting the oral dying declaration made by the deceased before the PW-2 as one reliable and inspiring confidence.

The whole idea of accepting a statement in the name of dying declaration comes from a maxim Nemo moriturus praesumitur mentire which means that a man will not meet his maker with a lie in his mouth. It is believed that when a man is at the point of death and when every expectation of this world is gone, it hushes away every motive of lie.

Referring to judgment in Heikrujam (supra), the court said that the law regarding the nature, scope and value as a piece of evidence of oral and written dying declarations is now fairly well settled by various judicial decisions of this Court. A dying declaration, oral or written, before it could be relied upon, must pass a test of reliability as it is a statement made in the absence of the accused and there is no opportunity to the accused even to put it through the fire of cross examination to test is genuinity or veracity. The court has, therefore, to subject it to close scrutiny. But once the court is satisfied that it is a truthful version as to the circumstances in which the death resulted and the persons causing injuries, the law does not expect that there should be corroboration before it can be relied upon. However, if there are infirmities and the court does not find it safe to base any conclusion on it without some further evidence to support it, the question of corroboration arises.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more

Procedure to be followed on admissibility of additional evidence at appeal stage

In The Corporation of Madras vs M. Parthasarathy & Ors., the trial court had allowed the respondent company to file evidence in the form of photocopies and had dismissed all the four suits filed by the respondents with costs as the evidence were in the form of photocopies and were objected to by the respondents. On appeal the Additional District Judge allowed the respondents to file additional evidence in the form the original documents of the earlier admitted photocopies and based on the same allowed the appeal. In its turn the High Court also dismissed the appeal filed by the appellants who in turn approached the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court decided that the first Appellate Court committed two jurisdictional errors in allowing the appeals.  Referring to earlier judgements of the Supreme Court in Land Acquisition Officer, City Improvement Trust Board vs. H. Narayanaiah & Ors., , Shalimar Chemical Works Ltd. vs. Surendra Oil & Dal Mills (Refineri...
Post a Comment
Read more