Skip to main content

Real income for compensation can be determined from Form-16 issued by employer

Cause Title : Anjali Vilas Deshpande vs Prabha Rajendra Gupta, First Appeal No. 17 Of 2022, Bombay High Court

Date of Judgment/Order : 18th November 2022

Corum : G.S. Patel & Gauri Godse, JJ.

Citied: 

  1. Sarla Varma and others v DTC and another, (2009) 6 SCC 121
  2. National Insurance Company Limited v Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680
  3. Magma General Insurance Company Ltd v Nanuram, (2018) 18 SCC 130

Background

Appeal was filed by the Appellant/claimants was the compensation allowed by the Tribunal. The said compensation was based on the salary of the deceased as well as his possible promotion. The Appellant claimed that the tribunal had erred in relying only on the last drawn salary slip of the deceased and refused to consider the income of the deceased as per Form 16 which is submitted under the Income Tax Act. The Appellant/claimants relied upon last letter issued by the employer which revealed that the employer had revised the salary of the deceased few months before the accident.

The insurer objected to the nature of the job and income of the deceased as claimed by the Appellant/claimants. 

Judgment

The High Court observed that the Tribunal has considered as to whether the income of the deceased is to be calculated as per the last drawn salary slip or as per Form 16 and recorded that the Form 16 showed much more income than the the last month salary of the deceased. The Tribunal had also considered the last letter issued by the employer which indicated revision of the salary of the deceased due to good performance but decided not to include the additional amount (allowance / perks) which was in the Form 16 cannot be considered as permanent source of income of the deceased as there were always ups and downs in the progress of business. Therefore, the only earning of the deceased taken into consideration by the Tribunal was as per the last drawn salary.

The HC disagreeing with Tribunal held that  Form 16 is a reliable piece of evidence to determine the real income of the deceased as the same has been signed and generated by the employer of the deceased. The income shown in the Form 16 is attributable to the amounts earned by the deceased from his employer and there is no evidence produced by the Respondents to show that the income of the deceased was contrary to what is shown in Form 16. 

The HC observed that evidence and documents produced on record shows that over and above the basic salary, the deceased was also entitled to an additional remuneration on account of his performance and thus there is no reason to disbelieve that the deceased would have been always entitled to additional remuneration. Whenever a Tribunal or a Court fixes an amount of compensation in cases of accident, it involves some guess work, some hypothetical consideration and certain amount of sympathy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Court approached in the early stages of arbitration will prevail in all other subsequent proceedings

In National Highway Authority of India v. Hindustan Steelworks Construction Limited, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court opined that once the parties have approached a certain court for relief under Act at earlier stages of disputes then it is same court that, parties must return to for all other subsequent proceedings. Language of Section 42 of Act is categorical and brooks no exception. In fact, the language used has the effect of jurisdiction of all courts since it states that once an application has been made in Part I of the Act then ―that Court alone shall have jurisdiction over arbitral proceedings and all subsequent applications arising out of that agreement and arbitral proceedings shall be made in that Court and in no other Court. Court holds that NHAI in present case cannot take advantage of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for explaining inordinate delay in filing present petition under Section 34 of this Act in this Court.
Post a Comment
Read more

No Rebate For Stamp Duty Paid In Another State - Bombay HC

A three judge bench of the Hon'ble Bombay High Court (Bombay HC) in a recent judgment in the matter of Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Maharashtra State, Pune and Superintendent of Stamp (Headquarters), Mumbai v Reliance Industries Limited, Mumbai and Reliance Petroleum Limited, Gujarat1 has held that orders in case of a scheme of arrangement under Section 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 (Act) involving different High Courts in multiple states, are separate instruments in themselves. Accordingly, stamp duty would be payable on all the orders (and consequently, all the states) without the benefit of remission, rebate or set-off.
Post a Comment
Read more

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more