Skip to main content

Real income for compensation can be determined from Form-16 issued by employer

Cause Title : Anjali Vilas Deshpande vs Prabha Rajendra Gupta, First Appeal No. 17 Of 2022, Bombay High Court

Date of Judgment/Order : 18th November 2022

Corum : G.S. Patel & Gauri Godse, JJ.

Citied: 

  1. Sarla Varma and others v DTC and another, (2009) 6 SCC 121
  2. National Insurance Company Limited v Pranay Sethi, (2017) 16 SCC 680
  3. Magma General Insurance Company Ltd v Nanuram, (2018) 18 SCC 130

Background

Appeal was filed by the Appellant/claimants was the compensation allowed by the Tribunal. The said compensation was based on the salary of the deceased as well as his possible promotion. The Appellant claimed that the tribunal had erred in relying only on the last drawn salary slip of the deceased and refused to consider the income of the deceased as per Form 16 which is submitted under the Income Tax Act. The Appellant/claimants relied upon last letter issued by the employer which revealed that the employer had revised the salary of the deceased few months before the accident.

The insurer objected to the nature of the job and income of the deceased as claimed by the Appellant/claimants. 

Judgment

The High Court observed that the Tribunal has considered as to whether the income of the deceased is to be calculated as per the last drawn salary slip or as per Form 16 and recorded that the Form 16 showed much more income than the the last month salary of the deceased. The Tribunal had also considered the last letter issued by the employer which indicated revision of the salary of the deceased due to good performance but decided not to include the additional amount (allowance / perks) which was in the Form 16 cannot be considered as permanent source of income of the deceased as there were always ups and downs in the progress of business. Therefore, the only earning of the deceased taken into consideration by the Tribunal was as per the last drawn salary.

The HC disagreeing with Tribunal held that  Form 16 is a reliable piece of evidence to determine the real income of the deceased as the same has been signed and generated by the employer of the deceased. The income shown in the Form 16 is attributable to the amounts earned by the deceased from his employer and there is no evidence produced by the Respondents to show that the income of the deceased was contrary to what is shown in Form 16. 

The HC observed that evidence and documents produced on record shows that over and above the basic salary, the deceased was also entitled to an additional remuneration on account of his performance and thus there is no reason to disbelieve that the deceased would have been always entitled to additional remuneration. Whenever a Tribunal or a Court fixes an amount of compensation in cases of accident, it involves some guess work, some hypothetical consideration and certain amount of sympathy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

The recovery of vehicles by the financier not an offence - SC

Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No. 8907  of 2009 Anup Sarmah (Petitioner) Vs Bhola Nath Sharma & Ors.(Respondents) The petitioner submitted that  respondents-financer had forcibly taken away the vehicle financed by them and  illegally deprived the petitioner from its lawful possession  and  thus,  committed  a crime. The complaint filed by the petitioner had been  entertained  by  the Judicial Magistrate (Ist Class), Gauhati (Assam) in Complaint Case  No.  608 of 2009, even directing the interim custody of the vehicle (Maruti  Zen)  be given to the petitioner vide order dated  17.3.2009.  The respondent on approaching the Guwahati High  Court against this order, the hon'ble court squashed the criminal  proceedings  pending   before  the  learned Magistrate. After hearing both sides, the Hon'ble Supreme Court decided on 30th...
7 comments
Read more

When debt is bona fide disputed and the defence is a substantial one, the court will not wind up the company

In SHITAL FIBERS LTD.  vs  INDIAN ACRYLICS LIMITED, as per the respondent, appellant had made a payment of Rs.61,83,218/­. However, there was an outstanding balance of Rs.8,92,723/­ as on 28.7.2008. Since despite repeated requests, balance amount was not paid, the respondent issued a statutory notice to the appellant. The same was duly responded to. As the payment was not made despite notice being duly served on the appellant, the respondent filed the aforesaid Company Petition seeking winding up of the present appellant for its inability to pay admitted debts. The learned Company Judge vide order dated 28.9.2015 admitted the Company Petition. However, while doing so, the learned Company Judge observed, that since the appellant was an on­going concern, an opportunity should be granted to it to settle the accounts with the respondent by 31.12.2015. Only in case of failure of the settlement, the citation was directed to be published. On appeal, the Division Bench of the High Cou...
Post a Comment
Read more

Abusing in-laws a ground for divorce: SC

Abusing in-laws and not allowing them to reside in the matrimonial home by a woman amounts to cruelty to her spouse, ground enough for grant of divorce, the Supreme Court has ruled while allowing an NRI's plea for legal separation from his wife. A bench of Justices Vikaramajit Sen and A M Sapre said such incidents could not be termed as "wear and tear" of family life as held by Madras High Court which had said that a couple must be prepared to face such situations in matrimonial relationship. The NRI had filed a divorce petition alleging that his wife was abusive to his family members and did not allow his parents and siblings to stay in his house when they visited the US. Referring to an incident, the husband told the court that his wife had once locked him and his sister out of the house and abused them saying they belonged to a 'prostitute family'. She refused to allow her sister-in-law to enter the house and even lodged a police complaint against her hu...
4 comments
Read more