Skip to main content

Consumer forum rejects monetary claim - Learner's license is not an effective license

The South Goa Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum (SGCDRF) dismissed a complaint filed by parents of a deceased victim of a fatal accident that took place in Ponda in 2004, against the New India Assurance Company, Margao, as the deceased Sunil N Kadam was riding the vehicle with a learner's license.

The order stated that the claim of the complaint, the father of the victim, Narsing Nana Kadam, was rightly repudiated by the insurance company.

Kadam, a resident of Bicholim, had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging deficiency-in-service against the insurance company praying for a sum of 2 lakh alongwith 18% interest and also for a sum of 50,000 towards costs and legal expenses.

As per the facts of the case, the deceased who was employed as a mechanical engineer at a pharma company located at Verna Industrial estate owned a motor cycle insured with the insurance company under a policy that was valid up to July 25, 2005.

On November 8, 2004, at around 6.45pm, when the deceased was returning home, a tipper truck dashed the motorcycle. The nature of the injuries sustained by the motorcyclist lead to his death on the spot. The accident was registered at the Ponda police station on November 9, 2004, and the tipper truck diver was booked under Sections 279, 304(A) IPC.

The insurance company repudiated the claim for 2 lakh by a letter dated June 6, 2005, stating that their claim cannot be entertained since there was breach of policy conditions and Rule 3 of Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989. The company stated that the deceased was holding a learner's license which cannot be termed to have been an effective license and that learner's license holder or a temporary license holder, according to them would not be covered by the insurance policy.

Writing the order on behalf of the forum, president Jayant Prabhu and member Savita Kurtarkar observed from the FIR and other documents placed on record that the deceased was the only rider of the motor cycle without any pillion rider.

"As such, it becomes clear that a person could be said to be driving a vehicle with a valid driving license only when the driver who is having a learner's license is accompanied by a person who is having a valid driving license," read the order.

Kadam, a resident of Bicholim, had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, alleging deficiency in service against New India Assurance Company praying for a sum of 2 lakh along with 18% interest and also for a sum of 50,000 towards costs and legal expenses.

Comments

Post a Comment

Most viewed this month

Deposit Of Minimum 20% Fine/Compensation U/s 148 NI Act Mandatory

In OP(Crl.).No.348 OF 2019, T.K.SAJEEVAN vs FRANCIS T.CHACKO, the appeal was filed against the order of the lower court to deposit 25% of the fine before filling of appeal. The appellant argued that the deposit introduced through the Section 148 of the NI Act after amendment was directory in nature as it used the term 'may' while mentioning the issue of deposit. The Kerala High Court however disagreeing held that in view of the object of the Legislature while incorporating Section 148 into N.I. Act, the word 'may' will have to be read as 'shall'. The imposition of payment contemplated under Section 148 N.I. Act cannot be restricted to some prosecutions and evaded in other prosecutions. Since the amount directed to be deposited being compensation, undoubtedly, it is liable to be ordered to be deposited irrespective of the nature of the prosecution. Therefore, the word 'may' can only be taken to have the colour and meaning of 'shall' and there
Post a Comment
Read more

NCLT - Mere admission of receipt of money does not qualify as a financial debt

Cause Title : Meghna Devang Juthani Vs Ambe Securities Private Limited, National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai, CP (IB) No. 974/MB-VI/2020 Date of Judgment/Order : 18.12.2023 Corum : Hon’ble Shri K. R. Saji Kumar, Member (Judicial) Hon’ble Shri Sanjiv Dutt, Member (Technical) Citied:  Carnoustie Management India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CBS International Projects Private Limited, NCLT Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs. Union of India & Ors. (2019) Sanjay Kewalramani vs Sunil Parmanand Kewalramani & Ors. (2018) Pawan Kumar vs. Utsav Securities Pvt Ltd 2021 Background Application was filed under section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 alleging loan of Rs, 1.70 cr is due. The Applicate identified herself as the widow and heir of the lender but could not produce any documents proving financial contract between her Late husband and the CD but claimed that the CD has accepted that money was received from her husband. The applicant subsequently filed rejoinder claiming the debt t
Post a Comment
Read more

Jurisdiction of consumer forum is not ousted even if the other party has filed suit on the same matter in Civil Court

In Yashwant Rama Jadhav v. Shaukat Hussain Shaikh, First Appeal No. 1229 of 2017, decided on 18.11.2017,  the grievance of the petitioner before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission was that appellants/complainants had entered into agreements with the respondents for purchase of residential flats, which the respondents were to construct and despite paying the substantial amount to the respondents, the construction of the flats had not been completed. The State Commission dismissed the complaints and ruled in favor of respondents against which the appellants approached the National Commission. The NCDRC held that Section ‘3’ of the Consumer Protection Act, to the extent it is relevant provides that the provisions of the Act shall be in addition and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. Thus the remedy available under the Consumer Protection Act is an additional remedy, which Parliament has made available to a consumer. Even
Post a Comment
Read more